Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

We should ban public schools. But that's a whole different argument.

 

Back in the 80's the Afghans defeated the second largest super power at the time with not much more than AK 47's and RPG's.

 

Self/home/government tyranny defense.

 

Bazookas didn't exist at the time. But then no specific type of "arms" were mentioned one way or the other.

 

So...who has the stats on how many mass shooters purchased their weapons at a gun show and submitted to no background check because of it?



It seems to me there is a tremendous amount of emotion involved in some of anti gun folks around here. Twenty kids and 6 teachers being murdered is certainly no trivial event.

BUT to help maybe keep things in perspective. On average world wide 21,000 children die EVERY day. !6,000 EVERY day from hunger alone.

 

Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

I think it's becoming more and more clear who is full of shit about gun control.

 

Fanaticism is a belief or behavior involving uncritical zeal or obsessive enthusiasm.

That pretty much describes you guys. I am a supporter of 2nd amendment and understand that certain class of weapons have no real need in hand of citizens.

You on the other hand cling to your beliefs that you need military grade weapons to defend yourself from come unknown futuristic threat. Aliens? Red army invasion?

 

When you have no real arguments, I guess spitting out the insults is all you good for.

 

I made a point that the government is not just good for national defense. So, if one state decides not to pollute water and air, and the other one does not give a shit, is it Ok by your logic?

Then we might as well cease the union and each state can become its own country. Do you want such scenario?

Joking about what?

 

It is called common logic, lesser deadly weapon with a smaller clip capacity = a better chance to disarm the shooter. Not sure what is so complex about this formula.