Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PHOENIX TRADING, Dec 16, 2012.

  1. Please list the things I've gotten wrong.
    thanks
     
    #121     Dec 18, 2012
  2. BSAM

    BSAM

    Maybe he has a learning disability.
    Go a little easier on him, brother RC.
    He seems to be a very angry little soul.
     
    #122     Dec 18, 2012
  3. fhl

    fhl

    The kid's uncle says he was on an anti-psychotic drug named Fanapt.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/12/aspergers-is-a-red-herring-to-explain-newtown.html


    So a kid on some EXPERIMENTAL ANTI PSYCHOTIC drug STEALS SOME GUNS and kills some people, and the correct response is to ban guns?

    That's what the lunatic left thinks. In fact, one of them, a professor at the University of Rhode Island, thinks the president of the NRA should be murdered.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/12/caution_contains_obscene_language_quoting.html

    Well, now he says that "his head on a stick" doesn't mean murder.
    But guess how that phrase would be interpreted by the left if it was used against "you know who".
     
    #123     Dec 18, 2012
  4. Wow.

    For libs, any excuse to get their panites in a wad will do. No tragedy is too horrible not to be politicized and exploited.
     
    #124     Dec 18, 2012
  5. pspr

    pspr

    What are you doing here, buck? I heard that you and you buddies packed up your panties and went home.

    Maybe you should trade in your radio for a computer so your posts will be more intelligent.
     
    #125     Dec 18, 2012
  6. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    You have very interesting logic. When Traveler said:

    "Lots of children die from accidental death, way more than the 20 or so this year in school shootings. Why not ban automobiles and bicycles too?"

    you do not find it worthless or a ridiculous comparison.

    When I suggested that had the semi automatic rifles be banned, lives could have been saved, you find it worthless???
     
    #126     Dec 18, 2012
  7. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    There is nothing laughable in saving someone's life. Did you see the looks on the family members of those who lost their loved ones.

    Few of them could have had their kids alive today.
     
    #127     Dec 18, 2012
  8. pspr

    pspr

    You do know the shootings at Columbine occurred right in the middle of the Clinton assault weapons ban, don't you?

    All this gun ban talk is just the sound of liberals jerking off.
     
    #128     Dec 18, 2012
  9. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    I am a law abiding citizen, and you need no protection from someone like me.

    So far, I have not seen a single compelling argument of why a citizen needs a military grade rifle. 9mm hand gun can protect from pretty much anyone.

    The only reason listed so far is because "I want it". This is a childish answer. And sometimes children get their toys taken away from them, just the fact of life, and there is nothing you can do about it.

    Buy them while you still can.
     
    #129     Dec 18, 2012
  10. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    Nothing emotional about it. Said it before and will say it again, 9mm hand gun will protect you from pretty much anything.

    Stop comparing guns to cars, it is foolish. Why not comparing guns to bricks, you know it can fall on someone head and kill him?

    Still waiting for a real reason why a citizen needs military grade rifle.

    Guess you are out of ammunition to answer this one in adult manner?
     
    #130     Dec 18, 2012