Started with Reagan and its been mostly republican presidential rule from 79 to the present This is what republicans stand for ,get as much labor out of employees and pay them as little as possible. Republicans are against unions, minimum wage,against forcing employers to provide health benefits,against pensions etc
I found the following statistics interesting.... http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/simdiff.htm Summary: Geography & Resources: Canada and the United States are both very large nations, making up the vast majority of the North American continent. Canada has slightly larger territory, and the US has slightly more land. On a physical map the two countries appear to be on an equal footing, but in reality much of Canada is unsuitable for normal living conditions due to the very cold climate. This has resulted in the majority of Canada's population living along a long strip of land straddling the US border (see Canada population distribution map). Even so, the large geography of Canada does contain a great many natural resources, including one of the world's largest fresh water supplies. Although not counted as a renewable freshwater resource, Canada and the US share the the Great Lakes, which contain nearly 6 quadrillion gallons of water.13 Combined, Canada and the US would make the largest nation on Earth with the largest amount of freshwater supply. Population: The largest advantage the US has over Canada is its much larger population. The US and Canadian growth rates are fairly comparable, but the way they are growing is quite different. Canada's growth is supported much more by a higher immigration rate. The absolute number of immigrants to the US is much greater, but on a per capita basis Canada's migrant rate is nearly double that of the US. Likewise, the US birth rate is much higher than Canada's. Even when combined with the higher death rate, the US internal growth rate is nearly double Canada's. This results in Canada becoming more foreign, and the US becoming more USAmerican, at least on paper. One must consider the uncounted number of illegal migrants, which some estimate are coming at a rate of 500,000 a month.14 Due to the fact that Canada does not share a border with a less developed nation, illegal immigration is much less of a problem. The US Census Bureau and Statistics Canada classify ethnic groups differently, and therefore a true comparison between the two is difficult. However, Statistics Canada does record "Visible Minorities" so some inferences can be made. The US statistic above was calculated by looking at "one race only" results and ignoring all races which could not be assigned to either White, Black, Asian or Native American. Original data can be viewed from this link. The Canadian statistic above was calculated by classifying all Blacks as "Black", all South Asian, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Southeast Asian, and Filipinos as "Asian", all Aboriginals as "Native", and all others as "White". We can see according to this estimate that Canada has slightly more Whites, one sixth as many Blacks, over two times as many Asians, and over three times as many Native Americans, proportionally. As with life expectancy and religious affiliation, these are less to do with national differences and have more to do with regional differences. For example, Washington State's ethnic population makeup is as follows: White 81.8%, Asian 5.5%, Black 3.2%, and Native 1.6%.5 By and large, northern states, like their Canadian provincial counterparts, tend to have less Blacks and more Natives. Additionally, life expectancies tend to be slightly higher among northern states (See: Average Life Expectancy at Birth by State). The difference in religious beliefs is mainly due to high proportion of French-Canadian Catholics located primarily in the Province of Quebec. The Catholics of Quebec account for nearly half of all Catholics in Canada and thus highly skew the national figures. Economy: It is well known that the US has had the strongest economy in the world since the post WWII era. Comparatively, the US has more than double the GDP of the second highest ranked country, Japan, which is just over 4.6 trillion.15 However, the statistic that really shows how well a country is doing comparative to their population is the GDP per capita figure. In this category, the US lists within the top ten countries of the world. It outperforms Canada by nearly 18%, and China, the 4th largest world economy, by 24.7 times.15 In 2004, the most current year data is available, the US posted a much better GDP growth rate, but over the long term both Canada and the US are growing at very comparable rates. Economics is obviously a complicated area and there are many factors to consider, but one major factor that helps the US maintain its strength in the global economy and in comparison to Canada in particular, is its large domestic market. Interestingly, if the European Union is counted as a nation, it would have a larger GDP than the United States, but Canada and the United States combined would make the world's largest economy. Military: One of the main reasons why the US spends so much on its military is that it is the economic leader of the world. Holding that place makes enemies of smaller, less wealthy countries and/or groups that oppose the fundamental beliefs of democracy and freedom that the United States stands for. For example, North Korea spends approximately 31% of its GDP on its military, while its people literally starve. Many other hostile countries do not publicly give out information on military expenditures. However, it is well known that countries such as Iran, Libya, and others are in the process of seeking or already possess nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. As the only remaining superpower in the world, the United States sees itself as obligated to try and keep peace and order. Many people may oppose actions that the US takes or has taken to fulfill that obligation, but if not for the US, many aggressive land-hungry nations would be waging bloody wars every day. Canada plays a part in keeping the peace, though its political support greatly outweighs its military contributions. Many First or Second World countries, and a few Third World countries have the ability to defeat Canada alone in a military engagement. However, Canada is one of the safest places in the world to live because the US is immediately west and south of it. Representatives of Government: What the above figures illustrate, is that on a comparative level Canada has a much bigger government. Although it is debatable whether much of Parliaments back-benchers or the 105 un-elected Senators actually represent Canada, this does all cost the Canadian taxpayer much more than the US taxpayer. This is simply because Canada does not have the population base to justify such a huge government. UN rating: The once much emphasized fact by many Canadian nationalists. Until recently Canada has been rated #1 by the UN. Beginning in 2003 UNDP report rated Canada as #8 overall, and the United States #7. Canadians and Americans alike shouldn't feel too bad about this. The United Nations is an organization which has very noble humanitarian causes, such as "ending world hunger", "eliminating racial and gender inequalities", "reducing the economical gap between the rich and poor" as well as others. These are all problems that if could be fixed, would make the world a better place. However, the HDI rating takes into account only three very simple characteristics of a country: Life Expectancy, Literacy/Enrollment and PPP. Hardly a basis for declaring the "best country in the world".
Canada collects 6.1% more taxes as expressed in % of GDP. I knew there was a reason why I didn't like that place.
How many of us file our taxes as a percent of GDP? None. Why people bite at these nonsense statistics I'll never understand.
Or maybe someone here can, but I'm not going to hold my breath since the best thing about the "Politics and Religion" forum is that it keeps many off the regular threads, in their own corner.
Productivity has increased because of technology. The added wealth (productivity) goes to those who invent/own the technology.
Well that's a reply with content, and it's as good to see here as it is surprising. However true it may be due to technological advances, not all productivity gains can be seen are from technology (see number of hours worked.) So, presumably, those extra hours should have been compensated in a competitive market, but they don't seem to have been.
One of the things that technology sometimes does is increase the supply of labor relative to demand for labor. In other words, a new technology will often make it possible for less-skilled people to do a job that used to require someone with greater skill. If a job requires less skills, there are, by definition, more people able to do the job. Increased labor supply relative to demand drives down the price of labor (wages). Sometimes the inverse is true, but yields the same result. For example, technology sometimes demands people with greater skills, but requires fewer of them, thereby reducing demand relative to supply. These relationships are not always true, but are true often enough to significantly impact wages.
You sound like you are describing yourself. What will you do after the November elections? Go back to daily Kos?