At Least Moran D-Va had the decency to express his frustration behind closed doors and not in public view. Unlike on the hand Joe Wilson R-SC who had the audacity and showed an obscene lack of decorum and made a mockery of himself by openly shouting out "you lie" during the Presidential State of the union address, to which I might add the President in an invited guess of congress and fulfilling his constitutional duty. LARGE DIFFERENCE.
In 2000 and 2004, the Democratic Party of Hawaiiâs official Certifications of Nomination for Al Gore and Joe Lieberman (2000) and John Kerry and John Edwards (2004) both had the following identical language: This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national Democratic Parties by balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held _____ in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held ______ in _______. In 2008, the Democratic Party of Hawaiiâs official Certification of Nomination for Barack Obama and Joe Biden carried this language: This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preferences Poll and Caucus held on February 19, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado. What the Democratic Party of Hawaiiâs 2008 Certification of Nomination left out are these words: âof the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state andâ In other words, by omitting the above words, the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) was signalling the following: 1.DPH is merely certifying that Obama is legally qualified to serve as President by virtue of the ballots of the Democratic Parties of the 50 states. The DPH is not certifying that Obama is legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution! 2.The DPH is also saying that Obama and Biden are NOT the chosen candidates of the state of Hawaii. Why are we finding out about this only now, 20 months into the Obama presidency? More importantly, what can be done about this? By omitting certain words in its 2008 Certificate of Nomination â words that were included in its 2004 and 2000 Certificates of Nomination â the Democratic Party of Hawaii was signalling that (a) Obama was not constitutionally qualified to be President; and (b) his nomination does not have the State of Hawaiiâs approval and consent. http://www.scribd.com/doc/37528165/...tial-Candidates It is SOOOOOOOO obvious obama is a walking CON JOB that was slid right in through the back door.......and soooo many keep protecting this fraud on the AMERICAN people. Hey, that blood is on YOUR hands and not mine......I was able to see the CON a mile away back in 2008!
.....and let's not even get into his Selective Service record.....that document is a MESS (a "one-of-a-kind"....I guess he was special). :eek:
This is not true.Stop spreading these blatant lies 1.Obama's BC is valid in AZ.Its valid for military enlistment,drivers licences ,passports etc 2.You cant get a Hawaii BC stating you were born in HI if you were not born in HI. Lt. Col Terry Lakin's attorney, among others, has claimed that anyone, including foreign-born children, could acquire a Hawaiian certification of live birth, and so Obama's possession of such a certificate does not prove that he was born in Hawaii.[57] However, the suggestion that this could have applied to Obama was rejected by Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health: "If you were born in Bali, for example, you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate".[33] Another fact that refutes this specific claim is that the law allowing foreign-born children to obtain Hawaiian birth certificates did not exist until 20 years after Obama was born, while Obamaâs published birth certificate says his birth information was recorded four days after his birth in 1961, and explicitly states that he was born in Honolulu.[58]
Congress: Yes, Obama Was Born in Hawaii Yesterday, an innocuous-sounding resolution in honor of the 50th anniversary of Hawaiian statehood came up for vote on the House floor. The resolution from Hawaii Democrat Neil Abercrombie, which Greg Sargent first reported, included this line: "Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaiiâ¦" Why is that notable? Because it's just the sort of claim that angers the birthers â the movement of folks who believe, against overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that President Obama was not really born in Hawaii, and is thus not a U.S. citizen. The resolution ended up passing the House 378-0. Fifty-five members did not vote â but don't read too much into that, as 35 of them were Democrats.
I was. The United States 21st president was probably born in Canada and his father wasn't a US citizen
Thank you! Point number 2 made. DOWD: "Surrounded by middle-aged white guys â a sepia snapshot of the days when such pols ran Washington like their own menâs club â Joe Wilson yelled âYou lie!â at a president who didnât. But, fair or not, what I heard was an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy! But Wilsonâs shocking disrespect for the office of the president â no Democrat ever shouted âliarâ at W. when he was hawking a fake case for war in Iraq â convinced me: Some people just canât believe a black man is president and will never accept it. Now heâs at the center of a period of racial turbulence sparked by his ascension."