Just a rant

Discussion in 'Trading' started by mikeriley, Nov 18, 2023.


  1. Because if aggressive selling gets absorbed and no progress down, likely even more shorts trapped (when we already have macro shorts trapped), Not to mention it looks like this move may actually be buyers with real longer term intent as well. Now any buying that comes in, that pressure some shorts, more cover and they become buyers too. So basically for a moment in time there's an imbalance and to correct it we will go bust the highs and squeeze all the shorts out(shorts used as fuel to move us higher).

    Beyond that here's another way to look at it is just simply a pattern read. It's possible my above theory is wrong and not that I would want that, but point is price is in a pattern for some reason and when I notice that I lean on it until pattern fails. In the most simplest form I can put it - pattern has been down moves that don't go very far down (relative to overall move) and than we go take out the HOD.
     
    #31     Nov 19, 2023
  2. Good Morning mikeriley,

    Do you have any proof with performance metrics and dollars documentation and drawdown this strategy makes money of a sample of trades?


    Full Disclaimer : I am currently a Losing Trader so far of about -$4,800 on the fiscal year of 2023. Let's see how the next 2 months go. My comments are not worth a penny with a hole in it because I am losing trader right now
     
    #32     Nov 19, 2023
  3. tomkat22

    tomkat22

    All I know is there's been a whole lot of buying the last 3 weeks and shorts/bears have been taking it up the poop chute.
     
    #33     Nov 19, 2023

  4. Fair enough that's an even easier way to put it. Was just a matter of picking up on the pattern as early as possible and finding an entry vehicle or way to trade it while managing risk. Any extra actual mathematical data, confluence or overall market experience just adds to your ability to take better advantage of it. For me that edge is potentially gone now. Will need to Sunday night action, as well as potentially even some of Mondays action to see if can pick up on something else. If cannot than will just either not trade if it's too unclear, or if it seems neutral will just take both shorts and long setups as they present themselves.
     
    #34     Nov 19, 2023
  5. schizo

    schizo

    I'm glad to know. My buddies at Virtu are also telling me they're revamping their entire algos over the weekend. :confused:
     
    #35     Nov 19, 2023
    semperfrosty and SimpleMeLike like this.
  6. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    so is the Goldman Sachs and the J.P. Morgan.

    mike Reilly really shit the bed on this one.
     
    #36     Nov 19, 2023
    semperfrosty, beginner66 and schizo like this.
  7. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    Failures are the best but all I need to see in this situation is a break and close below the high (close) bar:

    ! GC CBHBCB.png

    Which then turned into resistance but that is besides the point that peeps are trapped up above and bailing quick adding to the drop.
     
    #37     Nov 19, 2023
    semperfrosty and schizo like this.
  8. schizo

    schizo

    But there's one problem. This ain't no proper breakout. Look to the left of the chart. There's nothing to base the breakout off of.

    [​IMG]

    This is a proper breakout.

    upload_2023-11-19_14-8-25.png
     
    #38     Nov 19, 2023
    NoahA likes this.
  9. schizo

    schizo

    Well, he promises to journal his trades so we'll see if he'll end up pooping or not. Frankly, he sounds constipated.
     
    #39     Nov 19, 2023
  10. Well I think that depends on context of higher time frames and your overall read of the particularly instrument. But generally speaking yes, I'd much rather take the setup you posted, as it's more clear that you have a sizable amount of buyers to potentially puke out.
     
    #40     Nov 19, 2023