At this point, that isn't going to happen before we open. The best we can do is put smarter plans for the next go-round.
I expect it will happen before we re-open because most states including New York and North Carolina will not move into Stage 1 of re-opening until the two entry criteria of adequate testing and full contact tracing are met. In North Carolina, only three counties have adequate contact tracing in place. One of these counties is Durham (near me) because they had their entire contact tracing team still left in place from the 2017 TB outbreak centered around Northern High School which sadly showed up again in February 2020. The combination of a relatively low number of COVID-19 cases in Durham combined with the existing contract tracing allowed them to be 1 of 3 counties in our state which fully traced every case of COVID-19. The other two counties are in rural areas and barely had any cases at all -- but also had dealt with the outbreak of other diseases in the past few years.
And the proper testing is what Cuomo is doing. Testing for Antibodies... 1. knowing the real dominator finally allows us to explain to the crazies that we have to re open.. This virus is not what they claimed. 2. We can hope that many of the infected have immunity...Right now it looks like 25% of NYC had it. 3. When you see that 25% of NYC had the virus... you realize testing and tracing would not have been able to accomplish anything. And the shutdown may not have done much as we already had the virus rip through NYC. 4. Finally it allowd Cuomo to tell you all the blueprint based on the models was wrong. time for a new blueprint... https://www.amny.com/coronavirus/al...-test-positive-for-covid-19-antibodies-cuomo/
Cuomo is testing for antibodies and you are calling it crazy? Cuomo's tests found 25 % of people may have antibodies in New York and you call it crazy? just search in google you will see cbs new york reported the same... you loon. Last week Cuomo said the models were wrong look it up.
so you are one of the crackpots for a continued blanket shutdown of low risk groups even though you have no data showing that shutdown overall saves lives at this point?