Interesting this: http://www.geragos.com "Geragos & Geragos stands for honesty and integrity in representation. As such, we will review your case and give you an accurate assessment of whether we can help you. Call 213-625-3900 or contact us online to discuss your legal needs." Listed under attorney profiles at Garagos is Tina Glandian. Hmmm. Things that you find out when you take a minute to see what kind of law firm would represent Jesse Smollett by lying through their arse. Note that defending him is fine and part of the job, and he is entited to a defense. Not saying otherwise- but she was clearly lying through her arse which is another matter. At least it set my bullshit-ometer off. Classy law firm dat. NOT.
brb, Leaking dirt on your opponent with strategic timing is not "weaponizing" information. brb, sowing discord using fake news is not "weaponizing" information. Face it, the Russians still have you guys singing their tune.
What response of mine could this possibly be in respone to me? I have not discussed anything about the collussion issue and this thread is about Smollett? Are you getting your wires crossed?
"Weaponize" is a term coming from the mouth of Shillary Clowntown herself. She said the Russians intended to weaponize info and needed American guidance to know how and where to drop the info. She said the guidance came from Trump. That's her basic charge. Wrong on both counts. Anyway, what are YOU saying? The Demoncrats and their American media PAC's (political action committees) have more influence on US voters than RT (on TV and YouTube), which would be, at best, Russia's most potent influence on US voters. Maybe half the hosts appearing on RT have come from US backgrounds.
Says "weaponizing information" is a talking point, Uses latest talking point from Fox news saying objective media is a PAC
I can use what Tucker Carlson says as i wish, since he made an excellent case for that as a matter of fact. I'm saying i saw Shillary Clowntown, in some interview with can't remember who, or what YouTube video, make her basic charge. "Weaponize information" is HER term, a term she used to describe a fictitious relationship between official Russian government, and Trump. Claimed they needed to know how to drop weaponized info on an American and needed Trump to tell them how to do it. My point is that RT is as potent (weaponized?) an influence as anything Russian, while most of it's hosts, who might appeal to US voters, are themselves US voters. Point being Russia does not have any more influence than coordinated (PACs) US media, having only one small media outlet reaching US voters.
Former Deputy Asst. Attorney General: Kim Foxx Faces Up to 20 Years in Jail if Convicted of Corruption Jemal Countess/Getty Images JOSHUA CAPLAN29 Mar 20191,493 2:40 Appearing Thursday evening on the Fox News Channel, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo told host Laura Ingraham that Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx could serve up to 20 years in prison if convicted of corruption for her handling of the Jussie Smollett case. Kim Foxx is under fire after all charges were dropped against the Empire star in connection to allegedly staging a hate crime against himself to boost his career. This week, Foxx’s office backpedaled on claims that the top prosecutor formally rescued herself from the case after Tina Tchen, the former chief of staff of former first lady Michelle Obama, pressured her to have the Smollett investigation transferred from the Chicago Police Department to the FBI. Breitbart TV Attorney General Launches Official Investigation Into Chick-fil-a Ban A partial transcript is as follows: INGRAHAM: What do you think about this? I mean, Rahm Emanuel, suddenly, has like put the brakes, Oh no, President Trump, go to baseball. Cutie. YOO: First of all, I think a lot of Americans, myself included, are outraged by this, the fact that this fakes a hate crime. Look, I’m a minority, you’re a woman, what if were to be attacked legitimately, and now we’re going to be less believed by police and prosecutors because of the example of this guy. I think that’s terrible. I think a lot Americans realize something ought to be done. Second, this is why we have a U.S. Justice Department. Okay, so maybe they just spent a lot of time investigating President Trump to no good effect. But, now they actually exist to make sure there is no corruption going on in state government. If you look at the details of this case where Mrs. Obama’s chief of staff calls the prosecutor, Kim Foxx, and all of the sudden these machinations occur and then the case gets dropped. That is exactly what the Justice Department is supposed to be involved in — to make sure there is no corruption in state government. So, I hope that President Trump is right and that the FBI is starting an investigation to look into this. INGRAHAM: What’s the potential criminal exposure here, both for Foxx and the state’s attorney office itself? YOO: So, Foxx could be potentially liable for what’s called mail wire fraud of depriving citizens of their honest services, which if she is convicted, right? This is the standard law that is used to go after corrupt state officials. Suppose she got a bribe, suppose she was promised a fundraiser or who knows what kind of other influence to drop this case, the maximum sentence is 20 years in prison
Sadly, Foxx will get no punishment. Smollett will get no punishment. Chicago will remain a Democrat cesspool. And once again justice will not be served to the rich and politically connected.
Jusse nominated for the NAACP "image" award. Can't make this shit up. No doubt he's a role model for "colored people".