this is a ridiculous comment, is your goal is to trade randomly ? the funny thing is that you are trying to look smart
I never understood the incessant need by novice traders to use a zero-lag moving average.....zero-lag to what???? price??? Just use price....duh
Price is noisy. The goal is to find a way to significantly reduce noise without introducing much lag. Hence the interest in adaptive moving averages, several of which unquestionably outperform conventional MAs in the smoothness versus lag trade-off. No serious trader is going for zero lag; that's unrealistic. But low lag is very feasible.
So they're claiming that conventional averages are more accurate than the adaptives. That doesn't make sense to me. And how do you measure smoothness? I know it isn't easy because I've yet to see anybody do it.
Undoubtedly it has to do with their over-the-top anti-piracy method which probably don't work under Win7.
======== RobertWise; 1. No; frankly studied/tested moving averages, so much, simply dont see much point in a new one@ this time.......................Perry Kauffman designed the ''adaptive ma'' but i like his books better than that ''new'' moving average.... 2.I like simple, exponential, & volume weighted MA can be useful...; all of them , all lengths have thier advantages/disadventages. 50 period,200, 50 period ma still help. About the ONLY problem with moving averages, theyre not useful in sideways/slop trends; but that not the MA fault, sofind a way to ''adapt'' to that defect...................................................... Wisdom is profitable to direct.
There is no such thing as an anti-piracy method that works. When a program must load in memory and run it cannot be protected by definition. Hackers just dump the running code into a new executable and there they go. Sad but true.