I can’t believe how dense you are. In this case no one is accused. Talk about loose with the facts. Additionally, that is a separate question of morality, do we believe the accused’s denial? Again, not an easy question. Anyway, you’re on ignore for being dense and boring and stupid.
I don’t see that at all. I don’t know how many times I explained to him this was an issue or morality, not legal, but he never even bothered to at least try to understand the difference and he was inconsiderate of my time and intentions. I find him to boring, too. No original thoughts. If I want the Fox News/NRA spiel I can just pull up theirnweb pages.
Thank you, AAA. UsualName put me on ignore before when he/she couldn't debate a gun discussion with me, so I'm really not surprised he/she has done it again now that he/she cannot debate me on the idea that an accuser needs to provide some semblance of proof before their claim can be believed by any logical thinking person.