THIS is your best answer to a question you've dodged several times now? At this point I can only surmise you lack either the intellectual honesty and or the intelligence to answer the question. More or less, yes. I have no issue with it. But then what the fuck could I possibly have done about it anyway? Enjoying history hardly makes me an historian. Although I guess it might appear that way sometimes compared to those who know so little history. Liberals in particular,
I'm being told by members I respect that you're a smart guy and excellent trader. Having started a thread to announce your "departure" from ET. Only to come back a few months later. I expect those guys to add drama queen to your bio.
TBH, I don't care what you or others think about my intellect, but if you knew my ed background you'd shit yourself with envy. I do find it comical that you allude to these PM conversations about my nick. Sounds reasonable to you? You think you let the cat out of the bag regarding my previous nick? You seem to be the last to know as it's common knowledge. And I came back the following day, not months later, as a propagandist to get surfer removed. Oh the irony of a guy referring to "drama queens" when his life revolves around ET with nearly 35,000 posts to his credit.
You're a constructionist, who is ostensibly anti-slavery, yet has no issue with the fact that the writers were slave owners. Yet you use that decision by the Supremes (upholding slavery and leading to the CW) as an analogy to the current Supremes upholding Obamacare. Holy shit you're nuts. So which is it? Dude, fix your html tags. It's poor netiquette.
i don't really believe there will be death panels but costs will continue to rise and eventually benefits will have to suffer. Medicare contributions clearly don't cover the cost so seniors need to pay more, obamacare is not going to cover the cost of medicare. it is raising premiums on young people who have no need for comprehensive health insurance to cover those who were previously uninsurable, that's really all it does. oh and it adds a huge amount of bureaucrats and taxes. awesome.
Talk to the CBO. You stating it as fact doesn't make it factual. I do understand your point, but disagree. I believe that ACA will be revenue neutral within a few years.
Not bloody likely, some of the dumbest people I've ever known were highly "educated". An observation and experience you are handily reinforcing. Comical? I can't imagine why but don't bother explaining. 1) No I don't think I let the cat out of the bag, wind bag. Too many others already knew. (sound reasonable to you?) I hadn't noticed mostly because I never paid much attention to your last two nicks. Apparently you weren't as important to ET as you thought. 2)The fact you came back any time makes you a drama queen for announcing your departure along with your pledge not to contribute here. See how that works? And prey tell how many COMBINED posts do your last three known alias' have to their credit? Ya know, for an apples to apples comparison, genius.
18,519. So you have 1.85x my posts, and I've been here over a year longer than you. Add the year and you have over 2x my posts. riskarb, atticus, drownpruf. They teach arithmetic in Appalachia? Must be a grad-school course.
What Issue should I have? Disregard the constitution and bill of rights they wrote because they like so many other wealthy men at the time owned slaves? The founders including the slave owners were very smart guys. Infinitely smarter than you or I. Yes they both shared the courts approval. As in the court is not always right. As is the court is wrong about the disaster known as Obamacare. What's wrong with them?
And this makes you morally superior? Who knew. 1)Now you're just being a jackass, again. 2) I had no idea how many other nicks you might have had. Hence my use of the word "Known" alias'. They not teach reading comprehension at all those prestigious universities you claim to have attended?