Biden and his handlers running around trying to do the weekly clean-up on aisle 6. They screwed up the messaging on the synagogue hostage situation - not daring to refer to it in any way that references either muslims or jewish victims. Just a generic terrorist attack of some sort to them. The reality is that this type of thing undermines their message and propaganda that says that domestic terrorist- ie. white people, republicans, and parents- are the true enemies of the democratic party that must be suppressed. In addition, it is clear that while the fbi and merrick garland were off hunting down angry parents that they let a loo-loo pass through security and enter the country to attack Americans. We will be seeing some olympic level sideways crabwalking going on when and if Biiden is asked about that. Probably Psaki will be tossing her hair around when she fields the questions, in that way that drives the lefties here to hot and heavy thoughts and that is all that matters to them.
Some of these headlines and articles get to be old and lame after while. This is the exact, same headline and articles that the media is running on Kamala- not just Biden. "Reset" for Kamala, and they are exploring ways to get Kamala out with the people and engaged more. WOMPTIDDY- WOMP-WOMP !!!!!!!! Joe campaigned from his basement, and SPRIZE, SPRIZE, the year end report is that Joe spent one quarter of his first year in office in Delaware. Joe turns and walks away and declines every quesition thrown at him that has not been pre-approved by his handlers. But now, they are wondering how Joe could "engage more." Womp. The problem of course is that their handlers previously decided that the best way to handle Biden and Kamala is to keep them out of public as much as possible. They positioned Joe and Kamala to stay out of public because they are both disasters but they compensated for it by handing out billions and trillions by the pantload which helped quite a bit. But now the new dollars are not flowing at that same rate and they are just two talking heads in DC to most dems. No free shiite, and no one will care about them. Refer to the polls for more on this. White House plots public reset as Biden's agenda flails The president’s advisers are looking at a variety of ways for him to engage more with Americans, officials said. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jo...s-public-reset-biden-s-agenda-flails-n1287619
Biden and the military taking well deserved credit for snuffing out an Isis cockroach. I have not seen Kamala's name mentioned but I expect that there will be reports "that she was in the room and a big consequential decider" type of thing. Give it some time, a day or two. They need to use it to rehab her a bit. It will fail along with all the other bogus attempts but whatever. Y'all will recall that CNN and others had interviews with her where they got her to say many times that she was "the last person that The President spoke with before deciding to withdraw from AFG." They got big mileage out of it and gave her plenty of air time. Then when the withdrawal turned out to be a complete disaster, they gave her a complete pass and required no answers whatsoever as to whether she signed off/concurred with the withdrawal plan.
Just the military taking well deserved credit... I never understood how any president can take credit for such a military operation when presidents just sit in a room and are told "We can go get this guy" and they say "ok do it"
I try to be generous with Biden once per month. I probably should not have used that up so early in the month but I am a giver. Having said that. There are times when the President can and does make a difference. For example, Trump clearly made the Solemani killing happen. The fact that the military generated the intelligence and capability did not mean that the president's role was not decisive. That is true regardless of whether one supported it or not. And similarly, Biden presumably would not have killed Solemani given his objection to it. And ditto, for Bin Laden. Biden has been clear that he advised Obama against it. But for today's/yesterday's Syria strike, that clearly already fell within the directive that had been given to the military to find and kill. Not much of a presidential decision required there, maybe some consideration of civilians, etc. And if one needs a republican president example, probably al Bagdadi was the same. I mean we already had bounties on them and orders to kill and they had located him. BOOM. What else could a president say?
Limbo Joe at it again. Biden’s approval rating drops below 40 percent for first time: polls https://nypost.com/2022/02/10/bidens-approval-rating-drops-below-40-for-first-time/