Prove the opposite of what I claim happened. And there we are. Nothing can be proved. So we have our theories. End of line.
I made a prima facie case with the video. I don't have to disprove your unsubstantiated rebuttal. Duh.
And you have no proof that my claim of FUBAR through communication is why he went to his right, is incorrect. Dude, what do you want me to tell you? He's an asshole. We know this. But it cannot be proven that his lack of direction is his fault. Use your mind, man.
I'll try one last time to dumb this down. We have a video, that, to a reasonable person, appears to show Trump being disoriented. That's the prima facie case. None of us here can swear to what's in Trump's head at that moment, but we see what we see; and it is what it is. Now you come alone and simply tell us that his people told him to go right. And that to the right, were reporters and shit. Now, you offer no video, no credible news source, no link at all. Then, you say it's our job to prove your pulled-out-of-your-ass conclusion is false. And because we can't prove your negative, it must be true, or some sort of "wash." How 'bout this: prove that there is not a golf ball amount of green cheese buried on the dark side of the moon. When you can prove that negative, I'll prove your negative.
What I am saying, and said in my post OP on this topic, is that neither side can disprove the other's claim. Trump is not showing signs of being a dumbass simply because of a video showing he walked one way or the other. To claim he is senile because he "seemed" to be walking toward the limo, then went to his right, and then was escorted back by the SS, does not mean that he was "supposed" to be getting into the limo at the bottom of the airstairs. Nobody on this forum knows what he was told to do when he got to the bottom of the stairs. Was he told to go to the limo, or was he told to go to his right to do a meet-and-greet which was suddenly cancelled? Sheesh! Can't you expand your mind a bit and see the possibilities?