Hahaha. This is great. Libtards are fucking morons. Begging the question: how Can a 12 year old have political views?
Lefties are a hatefilled people, you'd expect the opposite, but disagree with them and it's a personal attack and you've called them stupid and they will get angry. Mate got Angry, he believes in 2nd wave and we all have to behave, couldn't accept nobodys been listening to the muppets for 3months+ and zero sign of a 2nd wave anywhere, got angry and stormed off, while being in the town with everyone walking around like normal.
Back to the topic of the thread....these are new unemployment claims. It doesn't mean unemployment has gone down, it means generally that the rate at which people are losing their jobs is going down. At the point 100% of Americans were unemployed, for example, this indicator would show zero new unemployment claims. That wouldn't indicate the economy had gotten any better! In this case it just indicates things aren't getting worse quite as fast as they were. Not that things are getting better, wrt unemployment at least.
topic breitard will never cover: https://www.axios.com/unemployment-...nge-2e150e16-5846-4ca6-b158-914783f01e39.html Labor Department admits seasonal adjustment distorted unemployment data also politics>>>
Someone who uses Breitbart as source of legitimate news is already off my radar. It's like grabbing a Chinese government newspaper to show that China is a great country.
Nearly a million weekly claims and you're hailing it as a victory. Wow you ppl are desperate. Mkt digested it well. lol.
What about people whose state unemployment ran out last month, and are filing new claims for the next 6 months?
It's actually called the Initial Jobless Claims number, or colloquially "First Time" jobless claims. It wouldn't count someone who was already on unemployment, the whole point of the report is to provide an additional piece of data to the overall unemployment numbers to show the first derivative or acceleration/deceleration of new unemployment.