You said it was Obama's spending, as if he has control of non-discretionary spending, or as if his discretionary spending was higher than his predecessors.
Isn't Odumbocare his little baby? That is not funded in any way shape or form with 90% of people getting subsidies. Sorry but that's 100% his responsibility (and ultimate failure).
Not necessarily deficit causing, though, if revenues from all sources are sufficient to cover the subsidies.
Hey, hey, hey... What's all the bitchin' about? Obama only has us 18 TRILLION in debt. We'll get that paid off in no time. And, I do mean no time, as in nada, never, etc.
I think Obama can be forgiven for misinterpreting Staples' part-time policies, when so many on the right have beliefs like yours, above.