Jim Simons Trashes Trend Following

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by marketsurfer, Sep 4, 2015.

  1. Butterball

    Butterball

    You didn't post sh**.
     
    #71     Sep 7, 2015
  2. loyek590

    loyek590

    at anyrate, if you actually watched the video, he never "Trashed" trend trading, he simply said his math no longer worked on the kind of trend trading he made a lot of money from. And that led him to other applications for the math and new ways of using math for all kinds of problem solving.
     
    #72     Sep 7, 2015
  3. achilles28

    achilles28

    If price was truly random walk, stock quotes would jump from a dollar, to thousands of dollars to pennies back to millions or billions, in a matter of seconds. The fact that prices behave sequentially and reflect the overall state of the economy is proof enough there's no random walk. As soon as the rw crowd put constraints on their "random" data models (to mimic real price behavior) their data is no longer random. Duh.
     
    #73     Sep 7, 2015
  4. romik

    romik

    In a macro uptrend you buy dips, not breakouts. Buy low, sell high. That's it, thank you & goodbye ;)
     
    #74     Sep 8, 2015
  5. Prices are not random walk. They are almost a GMB. Take a look at this excellent blog by a young talent.

    The only reason you do not get large jumps is because of rules imposed by exchanges. Occasionally you do get them when liquidity dries up, ex. flash crash.

    I agree with you over the long term. If you look at monthly data, there is a trend.

    Michael Harris has a new blog where he says that trend-followers make forecasts. His blogs are ranked at the top by readers of the Quantocracy website. The blog on trend-following is worth reading. In his new book Michael Harris attacks backtesting, chart analysis, data-mining, trend-following, daytrading. I will start reading it soon when I get a chance.

    My conclusion is that Jim Simons is correct, couldn't be otherwise. He made money one way or the other because he understood the game.
     
    #75     Sep 8, 2015
    kinggyppo likes this.
  6. Maybe it works for stocks but not for commodities in general.
     
    #76     Sep 8, 2015
  7. #77     Sep 8, 2015
  8. Good stuff. Sounds like someone smart is reading marketsurfer. fooled by TA-- good book

    And thanks for pointing out the quantocracy site. Love the tag line-- anecdotal evidence is not welcomed here--- :)
     
    #78     Sep 8, 2015
  9. Book available only to rent, apparently --

    http://www.priceactionlab.com/Blog/premium/

    6-Month Subscription
    Premium Book
    $49/six months
    No refunds for cancellations
    Pay via PayPal or credit card

    If you subscribe for the premium book, you will not get a hard copy or a PDF. Instead you can use the username and password you select below to read the book online.
     
    #79     Sep 8, 2015
  10. panzerman

    panzerman

    "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as
    far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.” Albert Einstein

    Apparently Simmons has found something that makes math and reality converge to a profitable degree. Anyone have a clue what that math is (thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, DSP, etc?)
     
    #80     Sep 8, 2015
    StarDust9182 likes this.