Jim Simons Trashes Trend Following

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by marketsurfer, Sep 4, 2015.

  1. There is no graph in "history".
     
    #61     Sep 6, 2015
  2. Great point. The market holds the greatest attraction to those least suited for it. I think this is evident in this thread.

    surf
     
    #62     Sep 6, 2015
  3. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    LMAO! You do realize that description applies to you more than anybody, right? No? Clueless as always. :p
     
    #63     Sep 6, 2015
  4. Mtrader

    Mtrader

    For the graph you should try to use Google. And pictures.
     
    #64     Sep 6, 2015
  5. Mtrader

    Mtrader

    You compare Simons BEFORE fee with anybody else AFTER fee? That is complete nonsense like I said. It is like comparing your profits before taxes with mine after taxes.
     
    #65     Sep 6, 2015
  6. Who can be campared with him before counting fee?
     
    #66     Sep 6, 2015
  7. EPrado

    EPrado

    Call me crazy, but looks like TF has worked pretty damn well since the 80's. These guys who criticize TF"s are just haters/jealous. The numbers below over the long term are tremendous. People who invested in funds like this have made a fortune.

    http://www.iasg.com/Groups/group/du...m/World-Monetary-and-Agriculture-Program-WMA-
     
    #67     Sep 6, 2015
  8. Butterball

    Butterball

    Your reply just shows how clueless you are.

    Medallion did NOT return an annualized 80% what on earth are you clown smoking. Also, Medallion manages low single billion USD -- if it was open like Winton is its returns would suffer drastically. Harding manages $25bln. Plus you left out leverage. You have no idea what leverage Medallion is employing compared to Winton thus you're comparing apples to oranges.

    What a bunch of simpleton non-sense.
     
    #68     Sep 6, 2015
  9. Visaria

    Visaria

    If we assume they made exactly 35% every year after fees (say 40% performance fee and 5% management fee) and fees were deducted at the end of the year, then before fees they made 63.64% a year, over 11 years.

    If they started with a billion dollars and just kept compounding at 35% a year, the fund value would be over $27 billion. Since it is not (says $3.3 billion below), i assume they distributed a lot of the gains back to investors.


    from wiki:

    Since its inception in 1988 to 1999, the company's $3.3 billion Medallion Fund claims to have averaged over 35% annual returns after fees. The Medallion Fund is closed to new outside investors since 1993.[4] Simons retired at the end of 2009.

    Renaissance charges a management fee of 5% and a profit participation of, initially 36%, and now 44%, both of which are higher than the industry standard of 2% and 20%, respectively.[5]
     
    #69     Sep 6, 2015
  10. Any link to prove your point? I have already showed the math to prove it with links.
     
    #70     Sep 6, 2015