Jiggling the State of the Union seating chart

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by 377OHMS, Jan 14, 2011.

  1. 377OHMS


    Just watched the libtard Ed Rendell spew 10-minutes of garbage about the need to Dems and Republicans to adopt an "intermingled" seating arrangement for Obama's state of the union address.

    It seems that President Obama did not get enough applause from Republicans for his socialist polices outlined during the last state of the union address. Ed feels that forcing Republicans to sit next to Democrats will force them to applaud for the President and will eliminate the graphics showing half the room sittting in stoney silence while the President spoke.

    What load of shit. I hope the Republicans refuse. The democrats are developing a fight against free speech and expression at every level of our society.

    It is a war. The language of war is appropriate. Republicans should not capitulate on anything. The Cultural War goes on...
  2. bpcnabe


    I say let it happen as long as they allow for people to boo or hiss! This year, we won't have to endure another Nancy death stare if it happened.
  3. pspr


    I think more of the Supreme Court justices are going to pass on the State of The Union speech this time after being ridiculed by Obama last year. Republicans should just boycott it in their entirety. Better yet, at the first statement of non-sense uttered by Obama they should just all get up and leave in-mass.
  4. Lucrum


    I wish they had the balls to do that.
  5. 377OHMS


    Wow. Thats quite an idea.

    Only the RINOs would stay.

    The dems would howl for weeks.
  6. Ricter


    I think 'war' is a bit too strong, considering the importance of the topic and the amount of emotion you've got on it. 'Game' is more like it, and you are a huge fan of Team X.