%% Actually, I am not Jesus Christ/king of Kings But we know from the Bible, Lord Jesus Christ+ king David/king Solomon all those love Zion. As far as a new world order[nwo]; Jesus Christ is against an evil empire like russia or goofy global gov control freaks[nwo] that the Lord has has not set up. The Lord also controls the weather- climate. Good question.
When low info persons talk about Jesus Christ, they are generally saying that Jesus was the fulfilment of a Jewish liturgical tradition regarding a Messiah. But he wasn't. Even a popular book which seems to promote that idea has him asserting, "My kingdom is not of this world". So that rules out Jesus Messiah because the Messiah's domain is indeed of this world, centered in Jerusalem. The rest of these comments assume, therefore, that the as-yet-to-be seated (in Jerusalem) Messiah/(Christ), is, with whatever other Lord's rule over this earth, are ruling in minutia so detailed as to include even the weather. If the weather, then certainly every single ruler, president, or king of every nation. If so, then it doesn't make much sense that the "Lord" is either approving or disapproving of these particular thousands of rulers down through the ages, since really, only the Messiah is an approved ruler over the earth. For this reason, i rarely use the two words together, Jesus Christ, but i do appropriate (without the Jewish culture built up around it) the misappropriated Greek term Christ, and do acknowledge Jesus as the prime personality which trailblazed the concept further than it had gone theretofore, and popularized the concept amongst Jews and their then lords, the Romans. The concept itself had reached high water marks in the so-called "east", wherever Buddhism and Hinduism were popular, but was more specifically a less popular offshoot of Hinduism called Non-Dualism, or Advaita Vedanta, popularized by the late Adi Shankara. Non-dualism basically means no-world-where-there-seems-to-exist-polar-opposites-of-more-than-one-thing. It maintains a strict distinction between "Brahman" and the "play" of Brahman, which is a psychological venture into to unreal, non-existence space of fantasy and imagination. The non-dualist does not accept the "play" as anything more than a complex dream, to be discounted and dismissed upon awakening. As to awakening, there is only one Being to which one may wake up AS: Brahman, or, what i call Christ. Jesus took this concept and trailblazed it further, adding experience, and indeed knowledge, to inform him, his mind, that it was actually true. So for him, it was more than just faith, it was something he knew as a fact, knowing himself to be the one Brahman, or, what i call Christ. It should not matter the name of that Being, it only being One, or of one type. Names are foreign in a world where there is not more than one thing/being. In such a world, there is no distinction between one being or another which would merit a different name, as though it was in any way different from the WHOLE. Only in an UN-whole (unholy) world would a name have any significance. I use these names for educational purposes only. It's important to distinguish, for example, the concepts that Jesus championed, compared to all the other concepts that others have championed. Only Jesus' problem analysis and recommended remedies will help any other fractured member of the one mind to move the needle toward reunification (re-whole-ification) healing. Anybody who does accurately represent Jesus' brand of knowledge (beyond the gnosticism theretofore known) could call themselves Jesus, in recognition of the basic oneness of our mind's origin, and the end goal of the message upon that same one mind. But in respect for Jesus' work, it is probably best policy that people build upon that work using their own chosen name, since everybody's presentation will be slightly different. This is due to the fractured nature of a dualistic world. You know you are experiencing a dualistic world if it includes, within it, the possibility for both "good and evil", as well the dualistic nature of everything else within it. A tree, for example, can be both good and evil, depending on how it is used or experienced. A tree can be weaponized to cause pain and death, but can also be used to make life saving shelter. A world where there exists two such possibilities for the same thing, is officially dualistic. If you think about it, everything in such a world can be weaponized, having a dual purpose, and often is. [Arguably the terms Jesus and Christ have been weaponized too.] Non dualism says no such world actually exists, and so, can be dismissed as not much more than a dream, to be long forgotten upon awakening. Evidence that this was Jesus basic message is an obscure reference to "scripture", which says, "Awake, Oh ye who sleep in Christ". But it's not in any Jewish scripture. Most likely this is a reference to those same scriptures that Adi Shankara was interpreting, whose message Jesus carried yet a few more miles down the road of Universal Salvation, which is the collection of all the fragmented pieces of the playing Brahman, back to the real, awakened, only-existing Braham. For this reason too, probably, the Buddha is best known for asserting that he was "awake", not to be confused with earthly politicos who claim to be "woke". As a rule of thumb, anyone engaged in politics is still asleep. Being awake, you would not give any attention at all to a world that is wrongly trying to solve all it's problems through politics. So it is defamation to insinuate that Jesus is tuned into Fox and CNN as much as the rest of us.
You are wasting too much mental energy on this shit. Simple mind/spirit experiment for you...Try to remember your life, or YOU, before you were born. Can you? Probably not. Now try to imagine your life, or YOU, after you die. Can you? Of course. You can make up any shit you like about what you may be after you die. But since you will not be able to reconcile your before life, you will have no afterlife. But why is it so difficult to make up a life before you were born? The simple reason is that you did not exist before you were born. When you die, that is IT, dude! The same thing happened to Jesus!
Well it depends on who you are referring to. It is the hope, for anyone waking as Brahman/Christ, that any other personality with a name (ie. Jesus) will be so far forgotten that it passes away into the nothingness from which it came, no more to be talked about, or referenced in any way. I hope for this too, to forget whatever cast of personalities (assuming there were many more than one after several hundred re-incarnational experiences). Those who "Awake, oh ye who sleep in Christ", will awaken as, and only as, Christ. That Being does not know about, or think about, or remember anything about any other personality that once claimed to be "I" or "me" or "we" or "us". I don't see how that differs from what you are saying. What are you saying?
It refers to EVERYONE. Not even Jesus, Brahma or Krishna were immune. You have had your whole life to try this experiment. You need to start it now... Try to capture the moment in your mind when you fall asleep for the night. It is impossible. You lose consciousness, which means you, the YOU that makes you YOU, have effectively died. YOU no longer have form or function. YOU no longer exist. Ergo, Jesus said "I die daily". That is exactly what his ghostwriters were talking about. When you finally die, physically, there is no more YOU. That's it! Over! Brahma and Jesus and all these other characters from a 2,000 YO Dickens novel did not fucking escape death. They got caught up in the imagination of other writers, because the entire human race, from beginning to end, is deathly afraid of mortality. That is why we make up this bullshit of religion. It all stems from our conundrum of "Why are we here"? Our measly intellects cannot comprehend what the fuck our existence means, because at face value it has ZERO purpose in the universe! Well guess what...There is ZERO purpose to our existence. We are just chance lifeforms, and thankfully we will be all dead in 2 billion years when Sol expands and eats earth.
I've not said there is any purpose in a dualistic world, this world of people, neither from beginning to end. I've asserted that from beginning to end, nothing that seems to exist within those bounds, actually exists. Nothing actually happens. That's why i call it, at best, an "experience". You need to be more careful about using the word "you". Who, or what, exactly, are you referencing? None of the "you", "i', "we", "us", "they", "them" that claim to exist from a beginning to an end actually exist. It is these which are "dying" each night, not knowing the moment they fell asleep. When they "wake up", they seem to exist again. But these, by any name with which they may be called, have yet to awaken as Christ/Brahman. The Christ/Braham, likewise, has a hard time determining the moment it fell asleep. But regardless, after that moment, an "ego" (a fraudulent representation of "Self") takes over, and splits into multiples of egos. Whatever it (Christ) was before that moment (it seems to have fallen asleep), that "self" seems to have died. It (Christ/Brahman/God) may as well not exist, at least to that which is sleeping. The wish that any prior Being still not exist is just that, a wish to perpetuate the dream. Any mind which wishes to "Awaken, oh ye who sleep in Christ", must also wish to bring the dream to an end. It's OK to wish to return to that which seems to have fallen asleep/died. I'm saying THAT, the return to that Self, is the awakening. There is no other person or personality to which to return. I think you are confusing what i'm saying about ego death, to ego perpetuation. Ego death returns one's awareness to that one Being as the Self, which has no name, but which some call Brahman, and i call Christ. I've told you i've re-appropriated this name from a religion which did weaponize it. While egos seem to exist, and use words, we have a need for names. So i use the term Christ. Are you confusing this with the religion from which it was re-appropriated? For these reasons, Jesus was working hard to help people equate death and sleep as the same thing. The death of Christ gives rise to egos, which we call "people", or "nations". The death of people can take two forms: the most popular is the perpetuation of the ego through reincarnation, the least popular is the death of the ego itself, preventing any more incarnations (incarnations are experiences, not actual facts), and, re-realizing (re-experiencing) one's Self as Christ. Deaths which perpetuate the ego can be called rapid radical change, but unfortunately, the ego is not extinguished. In other words, there are deep and deeper fractal levels of dream-manship. The way people sleep and wake, is only symbolic. It is a way to reference the sleep and awakening of Christ, on a much more macro scale. People who are "woke" politically are still asleep at the Christ level.
%% LOL awake >woke. Good play on words. Jesus Christ may very well like FOX, SRN, CBN news. CNN tends to be propaganda- commie news network. WSJ has some good charts, mostly accurate charts ; but IBD tends to be much more accurate. CNBC has charts that look like they were drawn by a kid, no offence to the boy or girl that drew them.
I used to believe this bible/church/Jesus nonsense once. It was because of a very painful experience in my life, a breakup of family where I lost my wife and kids due to pastor fucking my wife. There probably, maybe is a God, but I'm sure not going to be a cultist christian believing in their perpetual bullshit. But like every sinner or corrupt person or system, there is good somewhere in there to be found. PS: not only did Pastor fuck my wife, he then dumped on his own wife and 3 kids and married my ex wife. Don't preach to me about God!