I was very hurt and concerned when I read this hear thing. So I done looked for it on the intranet and I found this real questiun were asked already. This is it........ "Hi everyone I took iq test one time & scored only 70 I know it shouldn't matter but I feel really disappointed I score so poorly. In your honest opinion can iq test be poorly accurate if you got nervous, or poor sleep, or you didn't try hard enough. Also can someone with iq 70 write question like this? Do you think can be retarded & become successful musician & music producer?" Best AnswerVoter's Choice gotchaanswered1 week ago If your iq was only 70, you wouldn't have been ae to ask your question the way you did. Relax, you're just fine. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131206132517AAbUeue
While I disagree with futurecurrents on many subjects, and I think that he simply reposts global warming material over and over again like a retarded parrot... I will actually assert that I believe everyone who regularly posts on P&R (including FC) has an IQ of 100 or above.... based on the written context of their sentence construction within their original material.
Another fake controversy. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/jyyAHfV6S_4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Why thank you. But judging by your ignorance and delusions about AGW and further confirmed by the tortured last sentence of your above post, I still contend that you are an idiot.
So it must be amateur hour over at FOX. A race baiter throws out the bait, and Ms. Kelly swallows it hook, line and sinker. Got to be smarter than that of you're going to defeat the leftists. Leftists do what leftists do. Throw show shit out and see if it sticks. Just more distraction from the real issues. Wise up.
I see no point about discussing the color of Jesus' skin. Because for many of us its what was on the "inside" that matters. but... for Stu... the historicity is of Jesus is pretty much only doubted by crackpots. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed, and most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted.[1][3][4][9][10][11] In antiquity, the existence of Jesus was never denied by those who opposed Christianity.[28][29] There is, however, widespread disagreement among scholars on the details of the life of Jesus mentioned in the gospel narratives, and on the meaning of his teachings.[5] Robert E. Van Voorst states that the idea of the non-historicity of the existence of Jesus has always been controversial, and has consistently failed to convince virtually all scholars of many disciplines.[9] Geoffrey Blainey notes that a few scholars have argued that Jesus did not exist, but writes that Jesus' life was in fact "astonishingly documented" by the standards of the time â more so than any of his contemporaries â with numerous books, stories and memoirs written about him. The problem for the historian, wrote Blainey, is not therefore, determining whether Jesus actually existed, but rather in considering the "sheer multitude of detail and its inconsistencies and contradictions".[30] Although a very small number of modern scholars argue that Jesus never existed, that view is a distinct minority and virtually all scholars consider theories that Jesus' existence was a Christian invention as implausible.[5][24] Christopher Tuckett states that the existence of Jesus and his crucifixion by Pontius Pilate seem to be part of the bedrock of historical tradition, based on the availability of non-Christian evidence.[24] Graham Stanton states that "Today nearly all historians, whether Christians or not, accept that Jesus existed".[11] The sources for the historicity of Jesus are mainly Christian sources, but there are some mentions also in a few non-Christian Jewish and Greco-Roman sources, which have been used in historical analyses of the existence of Jesus.[31] These include the works of 1st-century Roman historians Josephus and Tacitus.[31][32] Josephus scholar Louis H. Feldman has stated that "few have doubted the genuineness" of Josephus' reference to Jesus in Antiquities 20, 9, 1 and it is only disputed by a small number of scholars.[33][34][35][36] Bart D. Ehrman states that the existence of Jesus and his crucifixion by the Romans is attested to by a wide range of sources, including Josephus and Tacitus.[37] The Mishnah (c. 200) may refer to Jesus and reflect the early Jewish traditions of portraying Jesus as a sorcerer or magician.[38][39][40][41] Other possible references to Jesus and his execution may exist in the Talmud, but they also aim to discredit his actions, not deny his existence.[38][42] note... if click on the doubts page.. you see doubts such as wanting to discuss jesus as a magic mushroom.
By the time Santa is down our chimney he must be as black as the Ace of Spades. He might have started off as white though. The reindeer are probably not white - sort of brownish like Jesus if he existed. Hope that's not racialist. Well who gives a toss anyway?