JC Trading

Discussion in 'Prop Firms' started by get even TT, May 27, 2010.

  1. You're a tool.
     
    #11     Apr 6, 2011
  2. cstfx

    cstfx

    No, a Fool.
     
    #12     Apr 7, 2011
  3. gtgtgt3

    gtgtgt3

    It's almost not even worth answering your post....but I will. I choose to defend JC Trading because they are extremely honest guys operating in a business that has a lot of scumbags. While there have been numerous firms that have stolen money and gone out of business, JC has been operating the whole time with an excellent reputation. They pay out every month...no questions asked!

    I don't know what motivated someone like you to make up lies about a firm. Those first two posts do not have the same IP...they were posted a year apart....they do not operate out a house. I expect that you are a small trader that lost all your money and is now trying to make them look bad. Get a life.
     
    #13     Apr 7, 2011
  4. +1
     
    #14     Apr 7, 2011
  5. I'd defend JC Trading even though I've never traded there. I talked with them once and even though we didn't make a deal I could tell they were forthright and didn't get a shady vibe at all.

    Just because someone puts in a good word does not make them a shill.
     
    #15     Apr 7, 2011
  6. Wondering why you assume anyone relaying their experience with this firm, is a principal of the firm? Especially a guy with an ID that's nearly 4 years old like gtgtg3. That's a rather narrow minded way of thinking.

    Seems in your world people are supposed to sit by and remain silent as their character is assassinated. Maybe no one cares to defend the others you mentioned for a reason? I happen to have an account at JC and personally know the principals of this firm, met them several times and can vouch for them. If I need something done, it gets done immediately. I need something adjusted or need short shares, I get an answer immediately. I request a wire, I get it on time.

    They also happen to be sponsors of this site. Meaning they help pay the bills around here so you can come here for free and express your 'informed' opinions.
     
    #16     Apr 8, 2011
  7. hilarious, JC is in bed with Oceanview the old "tuco". I am not saying JC doesn't provide a reliable service and are not good people, but if they vanished your funds are in bed with Oceanview. Not my cup of tea!
     
    #17     Apr 8, 2011
  8. bpcnabe

    bpcnabe

    It's called the "IB Shill Syndrome" that has previously infected the tin hat brigade on this site. It seems the disease has spread to other brokers now too and those tin hats are at it again.
     
    #18     Apr 8, 2011
  9. +1 for JC Trading

    I have also traded at JC Trading for over a year and can vouch for the unbelievable professionalism of the firm. They actually answer the phone when you call....no "press 1 for customer support...press 2 for sales etc.". Customer support is also on all IM platforms for instant resolution to trade issues. When there is a platform issue and you have a position you cannot afford to sit on hold.

    I get paid the first week on the next month like clockwork.

    Call for yourself and talk to them...don't listen to some clown who joined elitetrader 3 months ago and has anger issues.
     
    #19     Apr 8, 2011
  10. Itrade2009,

    Good post.

    This person "newbie2010now" perhaps has some valid reasons to bash a firm, however many posts are contradictory and statements are made without any substance, such as the one found in this thread here:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3134924#post3134924

    And this one regarding Hold Brothers, found here:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3128968#post3128968

    Yet what's interesting is that "newbie2010now" actually made a POSITIVE comment regarding JC:

    "not a bad firm lots of good review"

    That comment is posted in this thread, surprisingly, with a link for many other prop firms, found here:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=212759&perpage=6&pagenumber=6

    So it's best to simply put on "ignore" list.

    By the way, it's been about a year since we last communicated on another thread regarding Epiphany, did you ever figure out how they operate as being exempt from Section 3(a)(4)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, I still can't, lol!
     
    #20     Apr 8, 2011