You might look into how Dershowitz defended. His preference with Epstein victims was to try and crush them so they withdrew in fear. Then when it came to himself... https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2019/11/08/alan-dershowitz-countersues-accuser-jeffrey-epstein-case-then-is-sued-by-david-boies/?outputType=amp
Again, Dershowitz is not a public defender. He is not forced to do anything. He seeks out these assholes.
A lawyer belongs to the bar and there are many rules about how to protect the judicial system while following the code of ethics
Rudy has not even been disbarred yet. Watch how this gets squashed by the old boy network. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjourn...sciplinary-committee/?slreturn=20210101114927
A public defender has a choice to continue his role. So does a private defender instead of your nihilist approach , what do you recommend The europeon system is not an adversarial process but it a a judicial investigation Instead of having your own lawyer a judge is appointed to investigate a case , you hope he is through because that is where the evidence will come from Its the "state" that sets the terms of the case If you are a villain of society how do you propose they get a fair hearing...
You argue that a lawyer should pull a morality move and only defend people they agree with..ok Then what does a unpopular defendant do How do you want to change the system
Try to read each word carefully, and then ask someone to explain to you what they all mean together: Dershowitz is an attention-seeking asshole. He goes out of his way. He goes the extra mile.