Bunch of pussies...crying like little girls. https://thewashingtonstandard.com/c...seals-all-important-videos-docs-for-50-years/
Let's provide the proper context -- instead of the demented screeching in your Washingotn Standard article The process to send the material to the National Archives is just following the existing House rules that have been in place for over a century. If you have a problem with it then get up with your House representative and urge the majority of the House to vote to change the rules. "House rules shield records given to the National Archives from public view for a minimum of 30 years, with sensitive information being held back for 50 years." Let's take a look at the proper context and information from a respected mainstream media source Jan. 6 committee is running out of time. Key documents may soon be locked away for decades https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-12-30/jan-6-committee-documents-evidence You know the Republicans tried to arrange a vote to not send the January 6th Committee documents to the National Archives scheduled for Tuesday this week -- but these clowns are unable to even elect a Speaker. Republicans move to retain Jan. 6 committee documents https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2023-01-02/republican-jan-6-committee-evidence
The Republicans need to just continue the investigation of the various areas which the Jan 6 Circus avoided even if their previous crap output is socked away over in the National Archives. Have we had testimony or forced testimony yet on the question of how many FBI goons were in the crowd and leading the charge that day? No? Okay. Just need more follow up hearings then. There are so many FBI issues such as that and dozens of others that I think they need to establish a House Select Committee on FBI Goons to give it full examination.
I've stayed out of most of the Jan 6th shitshow, and commentary on this forum or elsewhere. But it certainly seems that there is reason to believe that everything we were "told" is again, a total fabrication.
Proud boys lawyer wishes Tucker Carlson would shut the fuck up. Proud Boy's lawyer fears Fox News' new Jan. 6 coverage will blow up in his client's face Norm Pattis, an attorney representing Proud Boy Joe Biggs, is apparently not a fan of Fox News host Tucker Carlson's latest revisionist coverage of the January 6th Capitol riots. As reported by Politico's Kyle Cheney, Pattis on Wednesday denounced Carlson's decision to describe the January 6th riots as mostly peaceful. Specifically, Pattis said he's "outraged by what Tucker Carlson said" and added that "I don’t think any reasonable person... could conclude otherwise than that there was violence" at the Capitol on January 6th. Cheney notes that Pattis also expressed fears that Carlson's coverage could cause a "backlash" with the jury that would make them more likely to convict his client.
Jan. 6 rioters trashed a GOP senator's office, and he hasn't acknowledged it Newly released court documents and video reveal that a mob of rioters broke into the office of Sen. Jim Risch of Idaho on Jan. 6 and trashed it. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...republican-senator-jim-risch-office-rcna73913 Article has video of insurrectionists trashing his office. But, you know, they were just "peaceful tourists".
Donald Trump Jr suggests Mitch McConnell is ‘insane’ for siding with Capitol police over Tucker Carlson https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-mitch-mcconnell-capitol-police-b2297771.html Donald Trump Jr has hit out at Sen Mitch McConnell after the Senate Minority Leader criticised Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s presentation of the Capitol riot on his television programme this week. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy gave Carlson the exclusive opportunity to report on more than 40,000 hours of previously unreleased footage from the Capitol from January 6, 2021, which Carlson turned into a report that rankled members of both parties. Among the critics was Mr McConnell, who voiced his displeasure with the presentation at the Capitol earlier this week. “It was a mistake, in my view, for Fox News to depict this in a way that’s completely at variance with what our chief law enforcement officer here at the Capitol thinks,” Mr McConnell said. Indeed, the Capitol police chief issued a statement criticising Carlson — who he said “cherrypicked to present offensive and misleading conclusions” in his report. Mr Trump, who has been critical of Mr McConnell in the past, went after him again in a video shot from the driver’s seat of a vehicle. “With Republicans like Mitch McConnell, who needs Democrats?” Mr Trump asked. “He says he’s upset with the way that Fox News and Tucker Carlson depicted what happened because it’s in contrast with what the head of the Capitol police said in a report? Are you kidding me? Are you insane?” Mr Trump’s decision to align himself with Carlson and a segment of the Republican voting base that disputes the narrative of the Capitol riot as a coordinated insurrection aimed at subverting the result of the 2020 presidential election comes as the GOP has fractured into separate camps on the issue in the buildup to the 2024 presidential primary. Former President Donald Trump, Mr Trump’s father, is again a candidate for the Republican nomination — allowed to run again only because Republican senators like Mr McConnell voted not to confirm his impeachment following the riot. More than 1,000 people have been criminally charged for their conduct on January 6, though Carlson, in his report, painted a picture of a largely docile crowd that contained just a handful of bad actors. “The crowd was enormous,” Carlson said in his televised report. “A small percentage of them were hooligans. They committed vandalism. We’ve seen their pictures again and again. But the overwhelming majority weren’t. They were peaceful, they were orderly and meek. These were not insurrectionists, they were sightseers.”