Jamie Dimon (cliff notes) Occupy Wall Street - âStop vilifying big business. Things are pretty good, but we canât get out of this malaise (if business continues to be attacked).â Immigration â âAmerica has the best military and universities in the world. Itâs pathetic and immoral that we teach kids from all over the world and then make them go home.â Subsidies - âGovernment should stop subsidizing business. Just get out of the way.â Obamacare â âWould I like to see universal healthcare? Yes. But all we did was pile more stuff on top of a crappy system.â Payroll tax â âThe payroll policy is in effect for two months! What kind of a joke is that?!â -------------------------------------- OBAMA SAYS NEED TO `FUNDAMENTALLY RETHINK' HOW GOVERNMENT WORKS <object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7z_DqqKEcoo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7z_DqqKEcoo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></embed></object>
If Obama loses he is going to the head of the unemployment line very shortly. Our Acorn community organizer got a taste of the corporate lifestyle, meeting with the hedge fund managers, party like a rock star and Air Force One. He has exhausted his income opportunities on the book circuit and Imo, his ex Presidency lecture circuit will be confined to a "tent". Maybe he should have a beer summit with Rick Wagnor, see how that GM deal worked out so well for Hope and Change.
Is Jamie Dimon related to James Simon of Renaissance Tech? If not I don't give a crap what he has to say.
Jamie Dimon is a Socialist (government-supported) banker posing as a Capitalist. Obama is a banker/auto-company bail-out supporter. What's the difference?? As the 1st black president, Obama's post-presidency income stream is assured. Multi-millions. Guaranteed. Notice how the democrats are not pointing out what level the market was at when Obama was sworn-in vs. where it is now. Why not? Are they afraid that Obama will be seen as pro-Wall St in sheep's clothing? Or that they know a president has very little control over the economic cycles and a a bought-and-paid-for Congress?
I'm sure there must be a point in here somewhere. I bet it involves a conspiracy right? Please tell me it's a conspiracy. Anything else is boring.