You just fucked your entire argument AGAIN. You pulled Clinton's Blowjob out of a hat when you got cornered, and now you accuse me of doing the same thing with Reagan. (And let's face it, Reagan was ten times the criminal Clinton could ever be on his worst day). For pulling out the blowjob, you've reduced your argument to tabloid-style sensationalist rhetoric. Come on, TM, you're a little weak today. Pulling out Clinton's blowjob is CLASSIC republican blame-shifting -- it's a real joy for me to watch it play out at any level, so thanks for that!!
fair enough, i readily conceed that MOST pols are total hypicrites (like Bill Bennet's critisism of Clinton, think of all the casino time he lost having to set things straight) by the way, im neither a republican or dem (although im still registered as a repub from working on a campaign) i think the whole thing is a duopoly, a false choice, and i blame them EQUALLY for the buget mess, one side for spending, and the other for reckless tax cuts
I didn't;t bring up the clinton bj.....You brought up Clinton...i said that neither Clinton, nor Bush have any policy to improve the economy....You blamed Bush sr. for OBL...I mentioned Clinton's chance at him...You said he admits when he's wrong which even you have to admit is ridiculous...where is the miscommunication coming from?
Hmm...Kennedy aside (I'm not going to defend that prick!), the whole blowing coke and driving drunk routine does come to mind with the hypocrisy issue here... Frankly, TM, both of us are having a pretty tough time defending ANY politicians -- so why waste our time?? I need to trade today to pay the bills -- this is far more fun and interesting, and it's costing me money! I'm laying off for the rest of the afternoon -- but I do want to know about Jack Snow -- so let's (please) get back to him otherwise this thread will be banned to chit-chat where it will fester and die............. Peace, bung
star wars is total stupidity bush has spent his term convincing us that all anyone has to do is smuggle nukes into cities, then set them off later why watch the sky when the nuke is coming in on a logging truck from canada
This makes a lot of common sense, which is perhaps why it does not work in our world of politics. The fact is congress has shown itself over time to spend something like 105% of all available revenues. If you want an alcoholic to quit, you cut off the booze, end of story. Same with congress. Give them revenues and they will spend it. Plus more. Funny that we never hear these concerns about the deficit from Dem's when big spending programs are being considered, only tax cuts. There is one law of modern politics: Democrats will oppose any and all economically sensible tax cuts. The rationales will change, but they will always be against cutting taxes.
I have a question for you before this gets buried in chit chat. Sometimes a good mental stretch helps trading. Now that DEms want Hillary to be president: Will she be GIVING blowjobs in the whitehouse. ????????????
although im still a registered republican, i consider myself an independent i am against big spending even more than tax cuts problem with our spend-a-holics is that they still have a credit card thats the issue