Jack Hershey's Methodologies (SCT & PVT)-Good Bad or Ugly

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by sappjason, Feb 28, 2010.

Do Jack Hershey's Methodologies warrant serious study?

  1. Fantastic-Jack's methodologies warrant the full attention of all traders (both new and professionals

    26 vote(s)
    10.9%
  2. Good-Jack's methodologies are good and should be studied to enhance trader profitability.

    10 vote(s)
    4.2%
  3. Average-Jack's methodolgies are really no better or worse than any other methodology.

    13 vote(s)
    5.5%
  4. Poor-Jack's methodologies are poor (or inferior) and really do not provide the means for a trader to

    18 vote(s)
    7.6%
  5. Horrible-Jack's methodologies are potentially damaging and a waste of time and money to even conside

    171 vote(s)
    71.8%
  1. Jack,

    I never called you any of those names, so not sure why you included the reference in your post to me.

    Anyway, I think it's very simple: I see you or anyone extract 3x the H-L in the ES or any vehicle and my "orientation" changes drastically. You can't possibly suggest that they wouldn't.

    To study yours and Spyder's thousands of posts would take months at minimum, and it could take a year or more of practice to gain traction with any method, so I don't feel it is unreasonable to request seeing it in action. It isn't a ruse, but rather simply an opportunity to see whether or not the effort is worth the time. Seeing 3x the H-L being extracted at will would cause any trader to experience an epiphany that would change their views no matter how far they currently are from yours.

    You are obviously not going to allow me to visit you in Tucson or anywhere, but where can I go or who can I see that can demonstrate live the power of the method? It doesn't necessarily need to be in the same room, but just a scenario where it is obvious that the trades/calls are made in advance or at least real time and the outcome is indisputable. Can you help me make such arrangements?

    Who should I ask for at Rosenthal Collins?

    Thanks,



     
    #71     Mar 7, 2010
  2. So this man has traded with Jack and/or Spyder or at least can attest to the claims of their methodologies? Can he offer proof of any kind?

    Thanks,

     
    #72     Mar 7, 2010
  3. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    yes.
     
    #73     Mar 8, 2010
  4. game, couple of questions:

    (1) What level of performance would you consider not "outlandish"?

    (2) How did you arrive at (1)?

    There was a time on this site when a prominent sponsor denied it was even possible to come out positive trading stock index futures. Subsequent to that, there was a poll done and I remember 1 point/day ES was the popular response. That was years ago, however.

    It might be interesting to find out what is "believable" to the current crowd.
     
    #74     Mar 8, 2010
  5. That must have been before my time here. Which sponsor was that?
     
    #75     Mar 8, 2010
  6. Considering I am yet to be a trader so to speak, my estimates are subjective. To indulge you, I'll take a shot:

    Considering a guesstimate that the ES averages a 13 point H-L currently, Jack and Spyder suggest a good trader can routinely pull 39 points per contract from it on a daily basis... That is outlandish to me, and I would presume it is to most. I know both Jack and Spyder would blame my conclusion on CW but what I'd like them to realize is that I'm more than willing to allow them to show me the error in my ways. Of course they'll remind me they don't owe me anything, and they're right, they don't. However, I am asking them nicely to please show me an example of this for my own edification.

    I'd guess that extracting 1/4 of the H-L from their market of choice (on average) would be a realistic-ish hallmark for a good trader. That is of course some 12x less optimistic than Jack though. I may be way off, but that sounds reasonable to me for someone who knows what they're doing.

    What have your experiences shown you to be realistic?

    Oh, and 3x the H-L is outlandish because this would mean that an account as small as $1,500 could grow well in excess of 100%/day...

     
    #76     Mar 8, 2010
  7. Who it was is not important as he spoke for a lot of people.
     
    #77     Mar 8, 2010
  8. So . . . 1/4 of a day's range in the ES? Which you calculate current conditions to yield 3.25 pts . . . Let's call it 3 pts/day.

    How about my second question? Didn't seem to me you answered that, as your mind is preoccupied objecting to what you think others believe.
     
    #78     Mar 8, 2010
  9. Yeah, and you didn't answer my only question because your mind was preoccupied psychoanalyzing a newb (me).

    Yes, I think 3 points seems a whole lot more reasonable than 39. Here's a glimpse into why I'd guess this is so:

    There are a lot of moves during the day that "offer" as Jack would put it, 3 points or greater in the ES. It seems reasonable to me that a solid trader could capture at least one of these moves or several parts of many intraday to capture 3+ points on average. I stress average because I know we can't expext to go lossless, and furthermore we can't expect to make the same amount each day.

    Now, your answer...







     
    #79     Mar 8, 2010
  10. So . . . your answer is that it's just your guess based on your observation that there are a lot of moves of 3 pts or more during the day such that a person with sufficient knowledge, skill and experience will extract at least one of those moves.

    I take from your answer that it's reasonable that a person who has the knowledge, skill and experience to extract one of the many 3+ point moves can repeat it more than once during the day, except there's uncertainty with the success rate involved, and so the 3 pts/ day is an average. Fair enough, and thanks for your answer.

    Your question to me was "What have your experiences shown you to be realistic?"

    My answer is that my experience in life, not just in trading, has shown me that what I thought of as possibilities has been too limited. So I avoid aiming for what I might think to be "realistic" and consider just what I can perceive.

    That's my philosophical answer.

    My practical answer from experience is that 1x H-L is done before PM begins on most days. On those days when the market is in a "trend day" it will be less than that but the yield in points much higher. I rarely sit through an entire day anymore, however.
     
    #80     Mar 8, 2010