Jack Hershey's Books

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by pvTrader, Mar 20, 2003.

  1. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Psychiatric Help: 5 cents

    --Lucy van Pelt
     
    #61     Mar 22, 2003
  2. klutz

    klutz

    Who is Jack Hershey..................he's tampa obviously and he's laughing at the whole lot of you guys.
     
    #62     Mar 22, 2003
  3. Pabst

    Pabst

    The best paid guy in the world should be Hersey's editor.
     
    #63     Mar 22, 2003
  4. is not the ability to SPELL a sign of intellect ?? is not the ability to reduce the complicated to simple sentences a sign of intellect ?? jack hershey is dramatically lacking in both the above simple tests of intellect. what a mental paitent !

    jaCk
     
    #64     Mar 22, 2003
  5. bubba7

    bubba7

    Jack said to send this to you; Lucy likes Tad the best. Pass it on to whomever you think can help you google the names and types of interesting things.

    It's free.
     
    #65     Mar 22, 2003
  6. It is the lack of Jack's ability, knowledge of, or willingness to use a spell checker that makes us questions his sanity, and his desire to conform to convention.

    Should we tell him that ET has spell check?

    By the way, it is patient, not paitent. Ooooops!


    p.s. Up is a destination, not a direction when you live in a dark hole in the ground. Oh, I forgot Buggs, you do!
     
    #66     Mar 22, 2003
  7. Be careful when you are dotting I's and crossing T's, (comma) for they can get dramaticially out of order. If you do that just before an exclamation point, as you know, it turns into a fart.

    I just type run on copy. And my little spell checker seems to be out of pellets. Fix up the post that you think was the most outstanding as a help to you. If none were and you don't do it, then put me on ignore.

    I like that sig; jaCk is cute. It does show, however, when you try to do two corrdinated things at once there is some sort of metal screw up in the picture. You're having the same basic problem with the ? two. LOL. I meant two ?
     
    #67     Mar 22, 2003
  8. LOL

    Jack,

    You really went off in that post. I find it funny that you think you can give me an instant psychological evaluation over the Internet (for free none-the-less). I am smiling as I type this because it really is just silly.

    When people communicate on the Internet, without real body expressions, it can be very easy to take people the wrong way. It's obvious you can not tell from my posts when my intentions are serious, humorous, etc., yet you have come to your conclusion. That's fine, but just be aware that it's possible your assumptions can be wrong.

    The truth is, you just don't like how I started that poll questioning your sanity. If I didn't start that poll, this bickering would not be taking place. So that's definitely what this is all about. I never said you were insane. I listed that as poll choice because, as you know, many people find it difficult to follow your writing style sometimes (mine is easy to follow, you should study me). Because of that, I started a poll in jest questioning if you were super smart, a bit out of your mind, or something else.

    I will cede that the poll may have gone a bit over the line. I meant no harm. Obviously, you can continue to dislike me if you choose. However, I don't like to hold grudges and don't consider you an ET enemy, but you can think of me as you wish.

    FRuiTY P.
     
    #68     Mar 22, 2003
  9. 1. jacky, yours would be your utter inability to express what may very well be a complex idea (rather than the obfuscated drudgery it looks like, to me) in the kind of simple language, terms and concepts a moderately intelligent english speaker would understand.

    2. you might want to read that paragraph back to yourself a few (hundred) times.

    3. "descressionary"? see, that's not even close to being the correct spelling. you can't even excuse it saying you misorderd the letters, or skipped one. 30 books, some of them worthy of Presidential acknowledgement, and this is your level of spelling? hmm, me thinks that's another point to the skeptics! :)
    but you're right, that post certainly was much clearer. see, you CAN do it! (now, if only you would rid yourself of those nasty AGMs! :))

    4. the concerted effort in exposing you (or, at the very least, challenging your incredible claims) is the definition of helping others. ie, i hardly need to convince MYSELF that you are posting useless, misleading nonsense.
     
    #69     Mar 23, 2003
  10. Look for ****'s where I commented


     
    #70     Mar 23, 2003