You know whats funny, I bet if Jack actually showed a profitable track record to you, you'd whine and bitch that its "photoshopped" like you did to CallMate There is no pleasing you, cant say that I blame you though, if I spent years trying a method like you have and failed, I would want to believe it wasnt possible too
Meglo does tend to carry on. http://groups.google.com/group/misc...=jack+hershey+software&hl=en#88dcc788355b6a42 Have at it.
like the chart that was posted. I annotated it with a crayola 101 measure. The zones of one times, two times and three potato are just a little nudge so that what the market offers is there to see. (H-L) x 3 = 75 points was there for sure So were 50 reversal trades. Doing 15 or 20 trades would have been just as much fun. If a person looks at the trades vs the existing H-L as the day progresses, there is a lot more than 3X the H-L on the table most of the day, even just trending days. With regard to backtesting any statement I would make; that is not a possibility. Just try summing the crayola 101 by a forward scanned chart and see why your coding doesn't even pick up the pink lines and convert them to a P/L for the day. Use 25 contracts for the fun of it. Try coding the 5, 2, 3 and 14, 1, 3 rules for today and see if you can get an answer.
Yeah, you're alot more careful now because some of your past diarrhea, which was straightforward enough to be coded, tested out spectacularly poorly.