Which confirms what I thougt at the time and explains a lot. Scottd had an in with you and three other people, they see your secrets, code it up, get to CW, then the rest of the levels are deleted. Whatever information was in the posts to Scottd and especially deleted info makes it nearly impossible to figure out anything about your systems. While I scanned for quantitative logic, you should know that I do optimize for sharpe ratios. Last month, VAMI went from 1,000 in January to 2,800 by June. The sharpe ratio I had during the time of that period was 15, and sortino was 19. Unfortunately that performance was unsustainable and coupled with the fact it's impossible to remove slippage even with a good broker now that the systems are resting in an area where they are the first tick of the bar it's been 4% per day since Monday last week, or about 50% per week. On your system, Jack, if you still have the materials you shared with those individuals, please send them to bwolinsky@kccapitalmanagement.com, and please know I'd only be interested in posting results, not code. The only reason I shared code last time was so people could duplicate my results using the ASCII data file I exported from Wealth Lab, and compare them with the easylanguage cash cow. I don't know where you get the volume data for .SPX, but so much of the reason nobody believes you is because there are so few elitetraders that even bother with them. It's no wonder nobody believes you because that symbol is somewhat mysterious and the reason every ES 1 tick dumbass that thought your ATM is publicly available will just have to sit back and see if I really do ever progress beyond what's there. At this point it is impossible to progress because there is no information defined quantitatively succinctly enough to code since it has been deleted. I could help with this, but until I have the information I need, including pseudo code, there is no way for anybody to engage in this conversation about how to progress forward because the information doesn't exist anywhere I can get to it, probably with good reason. The idea that anybody could possibly have higher sharpes and sortinos than I had in May is laughable, and while I like the system Cash Cow, your PVT comments <b><u><i>never</b></u></i> define any of the values you're asking, making them just as unknowable as me telling you to recite <i>IQ and Income</i> without ever having seen the document. This is what gets me so annoyed that if this information is so important to you that you want to share it, please do. At this point, let me define what I need: 1) I have no definitions of PVT sufficient enough to create variables, inputs, or anything resembling a logical, robust system. 2) It is not clear why a bloxed parallelogram indicates market direction, and until it's backtested, it probably doesn't work very well. 3) Had I been privy to any of this information my responses would have been less harsh and probably more supportive, but if you don't get that this information you're asking me to duplicate to profit from the markets is not in any place accessible to me, can't you see why the student knows the teacher isn't really teaching?
I had referred to this table: http://screencast.com/t/z7LkBeLjfE5 TYVM for your answer! Sorry should have posted the graphic with my construct, of course... Best, Vienna
Helpful. It seems to assume your position happened on the next bar? What codes have you used to draw those trendlines and is it a function of slope in the linear regressions of the highs and lows?
If we are looking at the same graphics, then I think you are misinterpreting it. These are the ten possible bar combinations you can have and how you would draw the RTL and LTL. Those lines were drawn manually. It doesn't say anything about "...position...". Have a look at what Jack wrote about those 10 cases a few posts above. If you are looking for "...codes... slope... linear regressions..." then search for post from "Tums". He coded an indicator which draws those lines automatically.
Greetings Gentle Hersheybeings! Ruhula and the crowd here at the Mumbai Excellent Chai Shoppe and Daytrading Boutique! Moreings and moreings, we are finding that the traders here are given down on the Hershey methoding, and be seeking something newly. Being conditioned to the Hershey, they crave the delight of confusingness, so we have at great expensing commissioned the famed softwear expert Professor Joseph Doaks from the Mexian province Tejassa to decreate a new systeming of the daytrading for them. A screen shooting may be opened below for your delightment. One cautioning in search of truth. The voluminous charting is only for the comforting of those in the needing of it. The systemings are not in the using of it.
Likewise, Pinky has been working on his spindicators, hoping to one day decipher the indecipherable..... Though Pinky did do "The Pinky Dance" Fri afternoon to relieve some stress.... http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/528/pinkyfridayredux.png/
I always exit on or before bar 78. The reason is that margin changes and I have my linked in set at 94%. the extra non traded 6% is for bar volatility (trend volatility actually) You can always tell long from short since long has a pencil mark below the witing line of the tablet. I am very oriented to Tofte and how he sees representations. I use "cheat sheets" as landscape sheets in a 3 ring binder. there are six of them. the "hate to risk" graphic shows a hold. Hate to risk, the person, has emotional feelings during hold. These spontaneous feelings are telling him a bout his need to "survive". They say "suvive by not being at risk. Note his name for perpetuating his difficulty. That is why I chose jack hershey as my name. I always know that I know jack hershey. I have flipped through the cheat sheets to some extent for each "profit taking" bar entry. River wanted to learn how to do the trades listed. So I suggested he begin with the shortest trades. In the above mentioned illustration, I showed 7 "quickies". These are all seen on page one of my cheat sheets. If you look at the illustration I gave hate to risk, you can see just how the other pages are drawn out as encriptions of the market's operation. Originally, I had thought I would be on the record in real time. this meant that I could be sited by anyone where they could thoroughly examine my imperfections and thoroughly report them to the public. I was unable to get the arranger to understand what I told him. these questions of your are very cool because you need the answers to be able to keep track of each subsequent trade. The chart was used in the form it has to make clear how the concept "relative data base" really works. In trading, there is no mystery as to why so many people fail. as you look at hate to risk, he explains how he makes money and how he feels as thsi money making occurs. He adopted a bar by bar analysis. But he has yet to examine the system of analysis that his effort represents. The Paltalk arranger frightened us all by posting a chart. He did not even understand that I would be on Paltalk explaining something that was NOT even on his charts. He also thought I would call the whole day and then answer questions. after RTH. There is this huge mismatch of me and those who read me or trade looking at a platform we have influenced greatly (TN). The last time I let Larson's crew look at my screen, they asked if they could change it to a Bollinger display so they could work on the transmission problem. you can see this thread is a big miscommunication for several other reasons, some quite humorous others the bleak reality of the integrity of the finacnial industry. This Depression is going to be really really tough on the average Joe out there. Well here we are on the 11th. A lot of data points since the open on the 19th. I am settling for the data I have trransmitted in ET as a proof. As meagre as it is, I did call the open on 5 consecutive days. It looks like the CW can't "get it" on the open even. Thanks to those who explained to me I was wrong in making the money I did on each open. I just looked at my original where I added several days of trades. There are two pairs of identical trades (day-bar): 20-49 and 25-30 and 22-59 and 25- 10 There definitely are others but my memory, where they came from, is not that swift. Sorry I was sooo slow to respond.
Hi Jack, There was no proof of how you trade. Just few calls. The one I saw was wrong, you later said that you reversed after the open on bar 5 or 6. As always, too much smoke and mirrors, and not a single full day of live trading from you or Spyder, despite all your countless contributions to this forum. Regards, redduke