Do you even realize that, while trying to point out how I am "naive", you actually just agreed with what I said before. Think about it. By the way, PEP was pretty funny.
I just want to see someone else post a backtest on this data from WL. Does nobody use WLP? "Teachings" is right, which is why I considered it a fraud. Anyone that wanted to put a system out there rather than make grandiose claims should have simply written down the conditions. It's very similar to the scientific method. If no one else can duplicate your results, you must be lying. I'm not sure I've duplicated the results, but it has more potential to turn $10k into $1m quickly than anything we had before.
LMAO ... now that was funny! (especially when taken in context with the rest of this thread) LOL, Barron must love us.
Not really because a deluded Hershey "trader" losing money doesn't necessarily put money in YOUR pocket. And a winning trader doesn't necessarily take money out of YOUR pocket. Thanks on the PEP... it's an extreme composite of the koolaid drinkers I've run into here on ET.
At least I can code, and it doesn't sound like you know how or even want to try yourself. When you know EasyLanguage, Wealth Script, E-signal, and NT, you don't really worry about formatting or commenting. You can look at the code, and know what you're doing. I also know JAVA, C++, and VBA, but they're less useful than the specialty software for trading. I think you're just disappointed there's no comments, but I guess I can add that.
I do and I'll take that as a compliment. But I can't take all the credit, it's inspired by the real koolaid drinkers here on ET.
The code's fine. In WL it looks perfectly formatted with good spacing and all. I have a limitation of only being able to post certain file types through ET, so be thankful I at least took the time to post in a word document.