JACK HERSHEY METHOD EXPOSED AS FRAUD! *Debated*

Discussion in 'Automated Trading' started by bwolinsky, Dec 13, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rage at making a fool of you? :p :p :p
     
    #151     Dec 17, 2008
  2. No, at my question as to who is the better backtester/coder. You've said that J Hershey shit doesn't work and now Bwolinsky said that is one of the best backtests ever. One of you (or neither of you) is good. You can't both be good so which is it?

     
    #152     Dec 17, 2008
  3. Nah... your parents made a mistake.
     
    #153     Dec 17, 2008
  4. Who's the bigger shill for Hershey, you or Tums? Now which is it?
     
    #154     Dec 17, 2008
  5. Tums

    Tums

    #155     Dec 17, 2008
  6. It'll paste perfectly formatted into WL. And no, at this point I see no mistakes.
     
    #156     Dec 17, 2008
  7. It hadn't been giving me a list index out of bounds error, and, to be honest, T, it's only 10 pages because Jack likes to draw lines and make everything look pretty. The portion of the code that's just the system is only about 1/3 of a page.
     
    #157     Dec 17, 2008
  8. The burden of proof was on Jack, so I don't owe him any apology. But a thank you would be nice.
     
    #158     Dec 17, 2008
  9. Back and forth so fast? Or did Hershey's koolaid give you permanent brain damage?
     
    #159     Dec 17, 2008
  10. He is in his watchlist creating screeners, but since we were only using .SPX, we already knew which security to trade, so the peeking aspect wouldn't be there.
     
    #160     Dec 17, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.