What are you, fifteen years old? Maybe you are also a homphobic asshole? Thats why you like AAA so much?
So you are declaring your homosexuality? I mean, you did post about gay acts you performed on your brother. Probably a few people here would be relieved to learn that your genes will not be propagated forward.
They were permanently banned - and the FAA agrees and has the rules in place. Think 9/11. Hysterical, drama-queen shrieking is considered by law under certain circumstances threatening behavior. (Think the oft-quoted 'you can't yell "fire" in a movie theater). There are certain well-defined limits to "free speech" - namely, private easement and employment. Advice from Conde Naste Traveler about temperamental outbursts aboard commercial airplanes: "In the eyes of the government, however, this issue isn’t about politics, it’s about safety: someone acting in a threatening way has no “right” to stay on the flight, and at an even more basic level, most airlines state plainly their right to refuse—or remove—passengers for anything deemed lewd or offensive. And at the end of the day, the pilot has the power to decide what that entails. “In general, the captain of the aircraft is like the captain of a ship—they are the ultimate authority for whatever goes on in that aircraft,” says the FAA’s Dorr."
’Tis the season to spread joy and cheer — unless you’re a liberal still bitter about the election. Thursday, Ivanka Trump and her family were accosted by Dan Goldstein, a lawyer from Brooklyn, who yelled at her that her father, who has yet to take office, was “ruining the country.” It wasn’t a spontaneous outburst. Goldstein’s husband had tweeted from the JetBlue terminal at JFK Airport that Goldstein was “chasing” Ivanka and her family to “harass” them. “Why is she on our flight? She should be flying private,” Goldstein reportedly shouted when he saw them on the plane and allegedly engaged with her children as well. Goldstein and his husband were removed from the plane, with Goldstein complaining that he was merely “expressing his opinion.” The last few years, we’ve seen the creation of safe spaces, though they’re usually for protecting fragile leftists from disagreeable thoughts and arguments. Lunatic men badgering women on planes in front of their kids apparently is fair play — if that mother is related to a Republican you don’t like. The irony, of course, is that Ivanka Trump is someone liberals should be thankful to have in the incoming president’s inner circle. She’s certainly no partisan right-winger, and in fact has thus far during the transition been taking point on issues like climate change (she even met with Al Gore) and paid family leave. Why the rage at her? The Trump hate has gone around the bend when the family of the president-elect is gleefully harassed. The buzzword following Trump’s victory has been “normalization” — as if simply by pretending he isn’t president, then he won’t be. Katy Waldman had a piece in Slate on Wednesday noting that media, charged with covering the incoming administration, is doing its best on that front: “Wary of ‘normalizing’ the president-elect, yet condemned to document the perturbingly normal processes by which he is coming into power, journalists seem to have gone into full dissociative mode.” This disassociation isn’t convincing the millions of Americans who voted for Trump that he’s any less legitimate. It hasn’t taken away any of the president’s power, or changed one of his policies. It’s just made liberals look more rude and out of touch. The left is trying to turn the whole country into a liberal safe space — safe for them, dangerous for anyone who disagrees with them. They’ve lost their minds. http://nypost.com/2016/12/22/everyone-should-be-treated-with-respect-unless-youre-a-republican/