Any side effects to a vaccine show up within two months. This has been outlined by multiple medical experts in several articles. There is no issue with long term vaccine side effects in 3 to 5 years — this is merely nonsense pushed by antivaxers.
GWB and other ET trolls, those vaccines you think is the ultimate panacea is still experimental drugs no less. The complete study as to its effectiveness and safety will not be known like in Moderna's case was around October 2022? People have died, have had serious reactions to that vaccine. In contrast, Ivermectin which has already been tested and approved by the FDA is now being tested again for treatment of Corona Virus and being minimized by the FDA, so called medical experts and governments the world over, including the UN that everyone listens to? Now, a filipino doctor in the Philippines, Doctor Benigno Agbayani has been fighting to get the drug be widely used in the Philippines where hospitals are all full and overflowing of Corona Virus patients? So much for the masks, face shields, lockdowns and curfews imposed by armed police and military on the citizenry. Millions of jobs lost, people are starving and lining up at community pantries sprouting up like mushrooms. Ivermectin according to Doctor Agbayani has had numerous studies showing its safety and efficacy in treating Corona Virus but, experts would rather have people die in their ignorance.
The world has had anti-vaxxers long before 2020 because all vaccines has caused in a small percentage of the population short term illness, long term illness, permanent injuries or death... A very small percentage that's less than the chance of getting hit by a lightning bolt. Simply, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks except for a very small percentage of the population. FLU Vaccination Flu shot can cause in a small percentage of the population...anaphylaxis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and from the information given by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) it is possible to work out an approximate number. The CDC reports 1.31 cases of anaphylaxis per million flu shots given, so that would be about 183 cases per year in the US (on average, around 140 million Americans a year receive a flu shot). Anaphylaxis has a fatality rate of between 0.25% and 0.33%, so on average that would be one death every two or three years. Guillain-Barre Syndrome is a reaction of the central nervous system to bacterial or viral infection, most commonly food poisoning. It causes paralysis, usually temporary, and may result in a hospital stay of up to six weeks. A small number of people are permanently impaired, and approximately 3% -5% die. In contrast, 12,000 - 56,000 die from the FLU for not having the Flu vaccination. Vaccines for Chicken Pox, Measles, Meningitis, Mumps, Diphtheria, Rubella are no different...a small percentage of the population become ill / die from the vaccine but the Benefits still far greater than the Risks of not having the vaccination. By the way, in the 1970's there was FLU vaccine given emergency authorization with similar like results as the above for a particular strain of the FLU. Covid Vaccination / Trump Administration Reminder, the emergency authorization became controversy under the Trump Administration because it was approved only when White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows allegedly contacted FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn the day the vaccine would be authorized. Many asked for Mark Meadows to resign because he created a distrust for the vaccine and its something the Trump administration has never owned up to and many of them bizarre like secretly were vaccinated in January - February. Regardless, I rather take my chances with the Pfizer / Moderna vaccines than the Astra Zeneca or J&J vaccines. In fact, my Doctor has personally called me to warn me against the AstraZeneca vaccine because of problems I had with an illness in 2016 that almost killed me. https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/how-j-j...na-vaccines-from-pfizer-and-moderna-1.1589765 Just like past history of vaccinations...I highly recommend people get a full complete physical that includes blood work with their family doctor if they plan to get the Covid vaccination...that's what I did. Just like they do (complete physical) prior to giving children their routine childhood vaccinations and again prior to military duty...complete physical / blood work first...later you then get your vaccinations. wrbtrader
Know the facts...don't let trolls that hide behind an anonymous user name that then post online misinformation / disinformation impact your health. Instead...talk to your family doctor instead of becoming another Covidiot. --------- Here’s What You Need to Know about Ivermectin FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans. Ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses for some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea. Ivermectin is not an anti-viral (a drug for treating viruses). Taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm. If you have a prescription for ivermectin for an FDA-approved use, get it from a legitimate source and take it exactly as prescribed. Never use medications intended for animals on yourself. Ivermectin preparations for animals are very different from those approved for humans. What is Ivermectin and How is it Used? Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical (on the skin) forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea. Some forms of ivermectin are used in animals to prevent heartworm disease and certain internal and external parasites. It’s important to note that these products are different from the ones for people, and safe when used as prescribed for animals, only. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 --------- wrbtrader
Not that I am anti vaccine for older adults and the high risk... but what a fucking dangerous asshole he is for acting like we know the long term risks for new technology. How is it possible to know without data over 3 to 5 years?
I’ve taken all the vaccines in my life that work. No issue. Most Vaccines work and they are amazing medical technology. Some don’t work and others are downright dangerous. To insist otherwise is ignorance of the facts.
mRNA vaccines aren't gene therapy. Gene therapy, far as I understand it, is gene manipulation in the DNA to fight a genetic disorder or pre-disposition. mRNA vaccines simply help produce anti-bodies that attack specifically the spike proteins the virus uses to enter cells. They don't alter your genes.
First anyone referring to an mRNA vaccine as gene therapy is pushing complete antivaxxer nonsense. mRNA vaccines do not alter genes, they are not "gene therapy" or do any "gene replacement" --- all of these talking points are nonsense being pushed by COVID-deniers and antivaxxers. It should be noted that other mRNA vaccines for cancer and other diseases have been developed, placed in trials, and studied for years. Any long-term consequences of mRNA vaccines based on the technology are well known by now -- and there are no long term significant consequences related to a vaccine being based on mRNA technology other than other technology. Let's get to the facts of the vaccines and long term effects.. We will start with quoting a section of the following article... Covid-19 vaccine myths: These reasons for not getting a shot don't hold up. In fact, they'll set the US back https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/28/health/covid-vaccine-myths-debunked/index.html 'We don't know what the long-term side effects are' Any adverse side effects from vaccines almost always "show up within the first two weeks, and certainly by the first two months," said Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health. That's why he and many other health experts asked the US Food and Drug Administration to wait at least two months after trial participants had been inoculated before considering whether to give emergency authorization to Covid-19 vaccines. "If there were going to (be) problems ... they would become apparent within two months of people getting vaccinated," he said. "That's what the FDA waited for." The most serious vaccine side effects in history have all been caught within six weeks, said Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children's Hospital in Philadelphia and a member of the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. "I would say, please tell me what vaccine has ever been shown to cause a long-term side effect that was not picked up in the first two months," said Offit, a co-creator of the rotavirus vaccine who has studied vaccinology for more than four decades. "The smallpox vaccine could cause inflammation of the heart muscle. The oral polio vaccine was a rare cause of polio -- it occurred in roughly 1 in 2.4 million doses. ... The yellow fever vaccine is a rare cause of ... yellow fever. All those occurred within six weeks of getting a dose," he said. There may be very rare side effects that aren't immediately found in clinical trials. But that's due to the extreme rarity of those side effects -- "not because it's a long-term problem," Offit said. "Sometimes you're not going to pick it up initially because it's extremely rare, so you aren't going to pick up a one-in-a-million risk in a trial of 44,000 people," he said. Pfizer/BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson had about 44,000 participants in each of their trials. Half the volunteers got vaccinated, and the other half got placebos. The Moderna trial had about 30,000 participants, with half receiving vaccines and half receiving placebos. And because coronavirus is highly contagious -- killing more than half a million Americans and leaving many survivors with long-term complications -- you're much better off getting the vaccine.
Either these "experts" are paid to be misleading, they were quoted out of full context or they should fired for ignorance. "Any adverse side effects from vaccines almost always "show up within the first two weeks, and certainly by the first two months," said Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health." Any expert who was interested in truly educating others... rather than being a douchebag controlling fascist would immediately qualify the above statement and state... but... these mRNA vaccines are not an traditional vaccine. So we don't really know. as to your lies about long term consequences being completely known... you are completely full of shit and you are a dangerous scum bag for pretending you know something which you can't know. mRNA vaccine technology is rapidly evolving. And this is why there is long term testing and trials... Nobody but ignorant, pre fascist, assholes would claim the long term risk is know... after review literature about cancer and mRNA. https://molecular-cancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12943-021-01335-5 "However, mRNA vaccine applications have been limited by instability, innate immunogenicity, and inefficient in vivo delivery. Appropriate mRNA structure modifications (i.e., codon optimizations, nucleotide modifications, self-amplifying mRNAs, etc.) and formulation methods (i.e., lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), polymers, peptides, etc.) have been investigated to overcome these issues. Tuning the administration routes and co-delivery of multiple mRNA vaccines with other immunotherapeutic agents (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors) have further boosted the host anti-tumor immunity and increased the likelihood of tumor cell eradication. With the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of LNP-loaded mRNA vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19 and the promising therapeutic outcomes of mRNA cancer vaccines achieved in several clinical trials against multiple aggressive solid tumors, we envision the rapid advancing of mRNA vaccines for cancer immunotherapy in the near future. This review provides a detailed overview of the recent progress and existing challenges of mRNA cancer vaccines and future considerations of applying mRNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapies." ... The activation of multiple PRRs and production of type I IFN can be paradoxically beneficial or detrimental for anti-cancer immunotherapy. It is potentially beneficial for vaccination since, in some cases, activation of type I IFN pathways drives APC activation and maturation, promotes antigen presentation, and elicits robust adaptive immune responses. However, innate immune sensing of RNAs may be associated with inhibition of antigen expression, and thus dampen immune response. Specifically, phage RNA polymerases produce unwanted dsRNA during IVT that can activate innate immunity via PKR, OAS, TLR-3, MDA-5 (one type of RIG-I like receptors). Once the PKR is activated, the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-2 can be phosphorylated, blocking mRNA translation [17]. Moreover, the dsRNA activates RNase L upon binding to OAS [19], causing degradation of the exogenous RNAs. Ultimately, binding of dsRNA with MDA-5 and TLR-3 can activate Type I IFN, eliciting several other genes that inhibit the translation of mRNA [20]. Besides the dsRNA impurities, improperly designed mRNA structure may also activate PRRs like MDA-5 and PKR, abolishing antigen expression.