It's Official: Democrats are Unstoppable

Discussion in 'Politics' started by MoneyMatthew, Jun 30, 2021.

  1. gaussian

    gaussian

    Seems you were encouraging getting rid of due process so that we can continue believing all women.

    Unfortunately for you it is the responsibility of the accuser (or their representatives) to present sufficient, legally obtained, and valid evidence to convict someone of a crime. In fact, self incrimination is protected by the 5th amendment. It’s called habeus corpus El Civics Expert. It’s required.

    I’m not sure how I’m the one that’s ignorant when Cosby’s rights were deprived under color of law, and somehow we still believe the evidence anyway?

    I hope all that virtue signaling gets you laid because it certainly doesn’t make you look aware of how a court proceeding actually works. DA violates Cosby’s rights, case is thrown out due to corruption of evidence. The logical implication is that ANY or ALL of the evidence was fraudulently obtained. Therefore don’t pass go, don’t collect $200, and certainly don’t fuck up your job so bad a guy you locked up gets out.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2021
    #21     Jul 1, 2021
    traderob likes this.
  2. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Ocho said not the responsibility of the victim, so nice attempt at a rewrite and expecting someone not to call out your bullshit on somehow the vic becoming the accuser becoming the prosecutor. No one's apologizing for the prosecution fucking up. We're all just laughing at y'all trying to make this some sort of "dem" issue.
     
    #22     Jul 1, 2021
    Ricter likes this.

  3. If the prosecutor fucked up then the decision of the higher court is correct even if not fair. We all know of cases where the murder weapon tying the person to the crime was thrown out because of illegal search even though it is clear the person did it. This is supposed to happen to make sure prosecutors follow the law and are held to a high standard (wish police were held to the same standard).
     
    #23     Jul 1, 2021

  4. Wow.... this is too stupid to even answer.

    Go back and tell me where I said anything you are claiming I said dumbass. Has nothing to do with believe the woman or some Democratic bullshit.

    A prosecutor fucked up and the SC reached the right decision. Anything else you said is ignorant diarrhea.
     
    #24     Jul 1, 2021
  5. Overnight

    Overnight

    If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit?
     
    #25     Jul 1, 2021

  6. Well that was stupid for a whole host of other reasons haha
     
    #26     Jul 1, 2021
  7. Both prosecutors fucked up. The first and the second. The first fucked up by offering immunity in order to pave the way for the defendant to be financially punished civilly when he knew he could not get a conviction, or did not think he could. That is an abuse of his power and position. The second prosecutor fucked just by trying to revive the case ten to twelve years later to meet some woke goals, and with knowledge that the first prosecutor had extended immunity. They all clowned around. Both prosecutors and the trial judge and the Supreme Court had to de-clown it.

    This was not really a rocket science issue, nor was there a question of fact as to whether the prosecutor intended to offer full immunity. The defense got lucky and the previous prosecutor flat out stated that he did. Then it descended into whether the deal had or had not been perfected because it was not in writing. womp..womp.

    Although it is probably the last thing anyone wants to hear, similar issues will arise under the Maxwell/Epstein case. Even though Epstein and Maxwell are both guilty scumbags like Cosby, the South District of New York brought charges against Epstein and by extension to Maxwell on facts that were clearly part of that Florida case where Epstein got immunity for both himself and his associates and contacts including Maxwell in return for agreeing to plead guilty on the florida state charges.

    Now the government claims that any plea deal offered there was only binding in the u.s. florida prosecutorial district and not binding on anything that happened in new york or elsewhere. Nope. That is not going to fly.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2021
    #27     Jul 1, 2021
    traderob likes this.
  8. gaussian

    gaussian


    The fact this even exists is sickening. "Hey look it doesn't appear there's enough evidence you were actually assaulted so we'll try to extract as much money from a rich person as we can".

    #FundAllWomen

    If it's not the responsibility of the victim to not lie and manipulate the prosecution into taking your case then who's is it? Prosecutors are politicians. They took the case to make their careers on everyone's favorite prime time TV show star.

    Oh, right, the alleged victim's lawyer's.


    My dovetail into the dem thing was because #BelieveAllWomen is supported heavily by the left despite the evidence being almost insurmountable a large portion of these cases are fraudulent. There are men in prison right now for nothing more than a pretty girl crying in front of a jury. It seems that in these cases everyone, and especially the woke left, are more than willing to throw out due process (re: Kavanaugh and several high profile college athlete accusations) in favor of throwing the guy in prison.

    If you haven't been reading the news lately the opinion is this is all definitely because of Republican lawyers, Trump, and toxic white males. It is absolutely political, and you can blame your people for it.
     
    #28     Jul 1, 2021