What the hell are you babbling about? The Y axis should be scaled to show the data. Period. Your chart is scaled to hide the data. You are a deciever, intellectually dishonest. Hell, just like jem, you are a freakin' liar. The heat content is not an estimate, it's a calculation. Here's another one. Maybe you will understand this one.
Those are not world temps. I have exposed this lie several times now. That you continue to post this bullshit is just pathetic. At this point you may have well a tatoo on your forehead that says "LIAR" You are just a fucking liar.
OK then SHOW ME THE RAW DATA where the heat content was MEASURED to provide the Y axis content of your graph. Estimate, calculation, etc. is meaningless. Especially since the "calculation" does NOT align with the measured temperature results. Your chart shows 3X the actual measured results - hence your graph is a fraud.
Maybe he/they forgot that there is more than one instrument doing the measuring. Oooooops. That's OK, it's just an dishonest mistake.
Dunno. Did you catch the part in the NASA paper, re the thermostatic property of high altitude CO2, which indicates that layer will not only reflect some energy back to space, but also reflect some energy radiating from below back towards ground? A case where we do get to have it both ways. : )
that is the difference between fc and you... you read the papers and learn. fc just touts the same the things he was indoctrinated with when he received his "degree" from Algore online college.