You’re blaming Obama for misrepresentation when GWB is now representing the deal needed congressional approval? Come on. Good for you for even mentioning Trump getting a ding, however he deserves much more because Iran simply turned their nuclear program back on and started to increase nuclear material faster than ever after Trump pulled out. Come to think of it, our local Middle East expert, GWB, is very much in line with the Trump philosophy on that. He thinks if you make a bunch of threats Iran will just fold up like a lawn chair. Didn’t work out so well for Trump though did it?
As noted by TreeFrogTrader --- since this "Iranian Deal" was not a Treaty or legislatively approved by the Congress in the manner required by law -- it was simply an Obama Executive Action. This allowed Trump to overturn the Executive Action easily. Sadly this entire "Deal" was marketed by Obama & Kerry as a Treaty to our partners and Iran. Seeing what they were sold on as an "International Treaty" unilaterally eliminated without cause undermined the international community's faith in the U.S. There are two Presidents that bear responsibility for this. The first is Obama for pushing what is obviously an International Treaty without Congressional approval -- this should never have been done. The second is Trump who overturned the "Treaty" on whim which undermined the international community's faith in the U.S. as a partner in agreements.
Ok, now it’s 3 very big false claims. In no way was this deal “marketed” as a treaty. As a matter of fact there was much discussion about that the time being a weakness of it but as tft stated the likelihood of a president actually pulling out would take a crazy long shot like a dope like Trump winning to happen. No one with half a brain would have pulled out of that deal. It was a good deal because our interest was to stop Iranian nuclear development not control hostilities in the Middle East.
Heh, you believe that? Never was a day when they did not work full speed ahead. Never lost a beat. And they love Trumps cancellation of the deal (the sanctions not so much) because it allows them to shake a dem administration down again and get some bucks to fund terrorists and pump up their sorry arse economy. Rinse and repeat.
Let's see what CNN has to say... Iran deal: A treaty or not a treaty, that is the question https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/12/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-treaty-obama-administration/index.html While we are at it -- let's see what John Kerry had to say in the Washington Post. Even John Kerry says the Iran deal is not legally binding https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ry-says-the-iran-deal-is-not-legally-binding/ Of course... there is the Obama administration's attitude towards the Constitution. Obama Administration: Constitution's Treaty Clause Is Dead https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/kerry-says-iran-deal-not-treaty-because-it-would-fail/
The only thing true above is that Iran loved when the nuclear deal was ended by Trump. The rest completely fabricated.
Yeh sure, that part where I said that Iran looks forward to shaking another dem administration down for more money for their sorry arse economy and to fund terrorists. Fabricated? Let the viewers decide. Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching and everyone who is not in a lefty trance state knows it, which explains why you do not. Cha-ching, cha-ching.
I'm not even sure that is the case (not even the heads of state who have to deal w/the headaches of embargos), certainly not loved by the majority of Iranians.
Same deal with Cuba. Just like the Cuban government will endure poverty to hold on to power The Iranian theocracy wants nukes to ensure their form of government continues despite impoverishing the people.