Missed PA on 13:15 bar and mistakenly concluded no change at 13:35. Also lots of hesitation in real time whether or not 14:40 was signal for change - seemed like another ff traverse up was on a menu.
I would humbly submit and risk being clubbed senseless by one of Spyder's implements of atonement, that the channel construction began with the 11:40 bar. It is interesting (why I don't know - observational perhaps) that the YM did give us a new P3 for its comparable channel. A question for Spyder. Do the same rules apply to a 'tape' RTL that apply to a traverse RTL? Break on low V = fan, break on high V = optional fan, with the close in both cases being back 'inside' the original tape.. Thus while 'adjusting' the tape under such circumstances, we still have a tape. TIA lj
Like the impressive pileated woodpecker scooting about the back of my luxury 4-plex (just a stone's throw from a vintage "Road Warrior" trailer home), the rare ES "no overlap" pair is seen at 15:05 and 15:10 (on both TN and NT data feeds). Maybe the smart$ were in a hurry. lj FWIW I think the 'fast fractal' stuff is an attempt by the same crew to confuse and torment Hershey traders.
If one were truely "starting from the beginning" as you put it, one would not know anything about PA, PV, PKV. Now, would they? One would simply find themselves focused on learning to annotate ........ - Spydertrader