rightly or wrongly, I have concluded that 11:45 cannot be a real p2, so 12:00 cannot be real p3 so this is a ff traverse.
Looked pretty rightly to me Nicely done. If/when you have some time, can you explain what lead you to that conclusion?
I agree with DKM with respect to R2R. 11:50 bar is red and on increasing volume (not one of the three cases) - if I could draw a Lateral beginning with 11:45 Bar, then 11:50 would be non-dominant inside that lateral. But since I am forbidden from annotating laterals I must devise another way of explaining the placement of R2R. The sequence for down traverse (5 m ES level) doesn't appear to be completed yet. Thick numbered lines are 5 min ES level traverses, medium weight without numbers are faster fractal.
You'll want to ensure your gaussians match your trend lines and maintain the same resolution level. The market is still headed up at the 'added' R2R - Spydertrader
Spend a day or two focused on annotating without using Laterals (of any kind). See if that doesn't change your focus just enough to put you on the right track. No need for wholesale changes at this point - just subtle shifts. - Spydertrader
The above represents the classic case - one part of the brain knows the answer, but hasn't let the other parts of the brain in on the secret just yet. Your brains are telling you all that it 'sees' something correctly even though consciously you all cannot yet fully grasp the concept. Nicely done. - Spydertrader