Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. 1110 is a PA - so why is it doing this? Why?:confused: :mad:
     
    #9561     Nov 25, 2008
  2. Pace Acc. says we will cycle through the sequence again. Looks like we are cycling through the sequences here.
     
    #9562     Nov 25, 2008
  3. You mean everything from 1115 forward is non-dom?
    EDIT: sub-fractal, faster fractal sort of movement?
     
    #9563     Nov 25, 2008
  4. Neoxx

    Neoxx

    Thanks, Spyder. In retrospect, it does seem like a wild and baseless assumption. I was too ready to jump to a conclusion, even if it was the wrong one. I'll continue to review the chart and hope to find the answers that I seek.

    If you could clarify the latter query (regarding sequence recycling/resetting) I'd be much obliged.

    Regards,
    Neo
     
    #9564     Nov 25, 2008
  5. .
     
    #9565     Nov 25, 2008
  6. Spot on Romanus. The IBGS is bar 3 of a sequence-completing JW change signal.

    lj
     
    #9566     Nov 25, 2008
  7. No JW there IMO, just a Lack of 'continuation'
     
    #9567     Nov 25, 2008
  8. Avi 8

    Avi 8

    1050 -1105 is not a lateral, but one with a fully annotated chart would know that.

    Therefore 1110 is sequence complete, look for change.

    Amazed how one expects to find his way in the market without a proper map.
     
    #9568     Nov 25, 2008
  9. Yes, it is a Non Dom retrace
     
    #9569     Nov 25, 2008
  10. Thank you for responding Avi 8.

    1110 bar is dominant indeed - increasing red volume. However I can't help but notice a rather enormous difference in volume compared to the previous bar (61395 vs 31531). You appear to be saying that it's not a PA. Am I understanding you correctly?
     
    #9570     Nov 25, 2008