Well, in this particular case even the answer "maybe" will do because the next bar after the spike (not in the drill picture) sends a big jolt to remind that we are experiencing a sentiment shift. I am talking about the type of bar one very rarely sees as not change.
Read your post ten times out loud and see if you don't find the answer. Way too many tapes, but very thorough. Slightly off topic, but your future WMCN neglected to account for one additional case. I'll give ya' a pass on the typo and the 'crude' numbering, but sloppy trend line placement might create an environment where you reach an incorrect conclusion. Then, is your 'Final Answer' maybe or are you hedging? - Spydertrader
The final answer is maybe, unless you open the next card and reveal the bar which follows the last black spike. Otherwise anything other than 'maybe' would be cheating.
This is a very big presumption. The one I am no longer willing to entertain after studying some charts. No pun intended.
t'was a lucky guess, there's plenty of Gauusian Slope accelerations which aren't PA's - in this case it was. Coin toss. But the real answer is "insufficient data set for my level of experience".
The context which was described in that post may or may not be different from our drill here depending on whether or not Bar 4 in the drill is PA. If Bar 4 is in fact PA (which I can't tell you because I don't know) then the context you were referring to is definitely different from our drill.
Congrats! Yet another incorrect assertion! How many times you gotta be wrong before you change your handle again? Presumption or asumption? So look at the same paragraph you quoted, note the chart snip, and tell us what the last black bar of the previous day represents? (the black bar prior to the red OB of the previous day) Dominance or Non dominance? Isn't it a 'spike bar' too? Do you have the same context? Try studying 'charts', instead of just applying a rule set like edgers.