Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. Wouldn't the IBGS at 10:10 have killed your lateral? The 10:25 lateral was like the one he elaborated to me about yesterday although I don't see why it persisted past the BO of the tape at 10:40

    lj
     
    #8641     Oct 22, 2008
  2. It is my understanding that in order for an IBGS to kill a lateral it has to form in increasing volume.
     
    #8642     Oct 22, 2008
  3. Lack of 'continuation'

    As you have pointed out, clearly the market had its own ideas with respect to which bars provided a signal for change and which did not. Something must have alerted the trader that change wasn't on the table.

    What are the conditions where change cannot take place on the ES 5 minute Traverse level resolution. Once you understand what situations cannot ever provide change, then by process of elimination, you can locate which of the scenarios was at work here.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8643     Oct 23, 2008
  4. I always provide a direct answer. The answers I provide are, quite often, not what people want, but they are what people need.

    Unfortunately, it isn't Pace Acceleration. Such an event occurs prior to the completion of a Traverse Sequence.

    Sequence complete. WMCN? Did it?

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8644     Oct 23, 2008
  5. You want to avoid placing a lateral across a 'transition point' on your charts. In other words, where one thing ends and another begins. Even with doing so, note dominance entering the lateral (red), and dominance exiting the lateral (black). Something changed. :)

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8645     Oct 23, 2008
  6. #8646     Oct 23, 2008
  7. Either place each other on ignore or avoid responding to each others' posts. Magna has quite enough work to do without cleaning up a mess created by oversized egos.

    Thank-you in advance for your cooperation, and we return you now to our regularly scheduled programming. :)

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8647     Oct 23, 2008
  8. I take it that the sequence was not completed on 1535 bar and 1525 was not what I thought it was.
     
    #8648     Oct 23, 2008
  9. Correct. The Sequences completed at 15:45. With respect to 15:25, see my answer earlier today where 15:20 had to be a Point Two.

    (All times Eastern and [close of] ES bar)

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8649     Oct 23, 2008
  10. Magna

    Magna Administrator

    I will not allow this excellent thread, where people are working very hard, to degenerate into petty squabbles by children. Yeah, yeah, I know, "he started it... no... no... it was his fault.. he started it..." And rather than apologize later just don't mix it up in the first place. All disruptive posts have been removed and I ask that it be the last time I have to deal with such infantile shenanigans. If someone bothers you to the point you just can't stand it please use the IGNORE feature, that's what it is for. And a big thanks to all of you who didn't respond and went about your business.
     
    #8650     Oct 23, 2008