Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. Remember, When Price transitioned from Point One to Point Two the market already established dominance and non-dominance. The trader simply now monitors in an effort to know when the market has returned to dominance. In addition, WMCN does not mean "what the market must do on the next bar." WMCN means "what must develop in order for the market to complete the next sequence."

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2116923>
     
    • 1555.jpg
      File size:
      92.2 KB
      Views:
      1,192
    #8341     Oct 9, 2008
  2. One thing has ended, and soon, a new thing begins (wash, rinse, repeat).

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2116954>
     
    • 1600.jpg
      File size:
      122.1 KB
      Views:
      1,158
    #8342     Oct 9, 2008
  3. At the close of the day, the trader knows what has transpired up to this current point in time, and as such, the trader also knows what has yet to develop - WMCN.

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2117045>
     
    • 1615.jpg
      File size:
      119.8 KB
      Views:
      1,125
    #8343     Oct 10, 2008
  4. This is like watching a great movie. . .
    and part 2- next time, flashes across the screen.
     
    #8344     Oct 10, 2008
  5. Neoxx

    Neoxx

    Thanks for the drill answers, Spyder... as with Tiki, looking forward to part II.

    However, rather than providing clarity, it seems to have generated a different level of confusion for me.

    As an example, I attach my AM chart for today, based on the above explanations of dominance and non-dominance.

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2117692>
     
    #8345     Oct 10, 2008
  6. Tums

    Tums

    I don't see any 1-2-3 or D/N anywhere... :confused:



    p.s. is that auto-gaussian?
     
    #8346     Oct 10, 2008
  7. Neoxx

    Neoxx

    That's my confusion... using the above explanation, I haven't been able to qualify any points as 1, 2, or 3.

    Not auto-gaussian... my attempt at labelling the bars as Dominant or Non-dominant.
     
    #8347     Oct 10, 2008
  8. Again, you might not know if a bar represents dominance or non-dominance, but you can certainly recognize when something appears different than in the past .... "What wasn't that?" In addition, yesterday saw the creation of a dominant Trvaerse within a channel. This morning we have a non dominant traverse forming after the 'change' bar (two). What must come next?

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2117754>
     
    • fbo.jpg
      File size:
      44.5 KB
      Views:
      958
    #8348     Oct 10, 2008
  9. Neoxx

    Neoxx

    Thanks for the clarification, Spyder.

    p.s. the black line was actually the unadjusted LTL of my 15 min channel.
     
    #8349     Oct 10, 2008
  10. so far
     
    #8350     Oct 10, 2008