Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. Tums

    Tums

    because you are living in a different reality to mine.
     
    #8111     Oct 1, 2008
  2. ivob

    ivob

    Yeah well, whatever gives you the screentime.

    Also I like to add:
    >There are those however, who want to see even more

    Simply accepting you cannot know everything (vs. trying to explain) and that some trades are small losers (+ completely accepting this) is an important part of the key.

    regards,
    Ivo
     
    #8112     Oct 1, 2008
  3. charting drill....:)))
     
    • rtol.png
      File size:
      15.6 KB
      Views:
      3,641
    #8113     Oct 1, 2008
  4. Since your post about how "[you] prefer not to be mentioned as someone who made or is making money using this method", glad to see you've finally "figured it out yourself."

    Congrats on your accomplishments.

    I'm sure your collegues who spent considerable time answering your questions via skype are happy for you as well.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8114     Oct 1, 2008
  5. bi9foot

    bi9foot

    David,

    Would you mind going over how you completed your sequences in the am.

    Especially why you ignored the 1st IBGS on increasing volume (seq not complete). I completed my seq earlier (as shown in my chart).
     
    #8115     Oct 1, 2008
  6. Neoxx

    Neoxx

    Aide memoire for coarse sweeps.

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2100084>

    (p.s. not using medium tools or indicators yet, but I like to see how everything fits into the bigger picture)
     
    #8116     Oct 1, 2008
  7. Funny how I was chastised about this whole peak versus acceleration thing. More or less told I was out of line and that a simiple straightforward definition was in fact already given.

    CLEARLY IT WASN'T.

    I requested a definition that completely defines what peak volume is. I was told it was given.

    IT WASN'T.

    Spydertrader, long ago, stated in this journal he hid nothing about how he traded. Apparently that is no longer the case, and hasn't been for a long, long while. That's his choice. But to play games and insinuate that what I and others have stated is wrong is hooey.

    Just come out and say you are unwilling to answer the question unambiguously. That's fine. Dancing around and misleading people I don't think is cool. Not when you present the facade that you don't hold anything back.

    Clearly, MUCH is being held back. Too bad, this is hardly what Mr Hershey had in mind vis a vis paying it forward.
     
    #8117     Oct 1, 2008
  8. Looks like you have done some serious professional work in the past with idea boards,
    nice work.
     
    #8118     Oct 1, 2008
  9. dkm

    dkm

    After a careful debrief, I can see that my lateral beginning at 10:20 was incorrect and should have started at 10:40. The 10:40 incr red vol confirms a pt3 at 10:35, and 10:55 is the signal for change (lat fbo with irv). We then have:

    11:05 drv, hold long
    11:10 irv and close inside prev bar, hold long

    I hope that makes sense.

    David
     
    #8119     Oct 1, 2008
  10. As I have told your two (and possibly more) usernames numerous times, if you don't like the way I present information, put me on ignore, and stop reading the thread.

    Nothing you say or do has even the remote possibility of facilitating change on my end.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #8120     Oct 1, 2008