Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. dkm

    dkm

    20080819 14:00
    20080812 15:15
    20080806 11:30
     
    #7451     Sep 10, 2008
  2. dkm

    dkm

    20080812 15:15
     
    #7452     Sep 10, 2008
  3. dkm

    dkm

    20080806 11:30
     
    #7453     Sep 10, 2008
  4. gucci

    gucci


    Thank you very much!!!:)
     
    #7454     Sep 10, 2008
  5. R/R

    R/R

    Check Spyder's original chart for 9/8 posted near the market close.
    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2058754
    Note bar 5 and bar 6 both have decreasing volume after the pennant BO. Increasing volume didn't come in until the next (IBGS) bar. This is the also way it appeared in my charts real time as I remember it clearly. So I must assume Spyder saw it this way also in real time and still made the same decision about the validity of the point 3. Sometimes that's all you get to make your sequence.
     
    #7455     Sep 10, 2008
  6. Tums

    Tums

    Did you invent this? or did you find it in the methodology somewhere?
     
    #7456     Sep 10, 2008
  7. #7457     Sep 10, 2008
  8. Yes, I noticed that. Probably became increasing after refresh. But still makes no difference for our purposes: the increasing red in that traverse did not come from Lateral (either Movement or Formation) BO / FBO or from a Pennant / Adjacent bar Even Harmonic BO / FBO.
     
    #7458     Sep 10, 2008
  9. gucci

    gucci

    Ok. Now I'm lost again...:D
     
    #7459     Sep 10, 2008
  10. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2061876

    It's an accelerated Traverse. Would you agree that the purpose of annotating an accelerated Traverse is different from annotating an original Traverse if one looks at the market in terms of repeating sequences.
    Think about it.
    What is the purpose of isolating formations that appear to be a Point Three formation (where increasing volume comes from Lateral (either Movement or Formation) BO / FBO or from a Pennant / Adjacent bar Even Harmonic BO / FBO) from Traverses?
    I think it is to make the sequences more clearly evident and easier to keep track of.
    So, it is not an arbitrary decision to differentiate where does the increasing volume comes from - but a result of observing the seamless flow of sequences.
    In case of an accelerated Traverse, I think, one starts counting down another sequence (flaw, VE before FTT) and how an accelerated Traverse is formed, I think is irrelevant, because we already have channel sequence and original (orange) traverse sequence completed.
     
    #7460     Sep 10, 2008