I have continued to annotate, live and EOD practice and do the crayola thing for fractals. What I have discovered is that I have no problem annotating by itself, but... When I really focus on the fractals, tapes builiding traverses and traverses builiding channels, I get stumped fast. I'm pretty happy with this, because I now realize and can accept fully that something huge is missing in my perception. Perhaps I am taking something Spyder has said time and again out of context or too literally. What happens is that it looks (to me) like a piece of a sequence is left dangling. See the example attached. I have removed all other annotations in order to focus on the essence of my question. The gray lines, to the best of my understanding represents a "pt3 channel" TRAVERSE. The purple lines represent an accelerated pt3 channel. But, it seems that it too must then be a traverse. But a traverse of what? No BIG or CONSTRUCTED channel yet exists. The entire earlier part of the day was one big up traverse. So the gray down traverse is no surprise. Now, the turquoise tape forms. But (and I have studied this chart and others like it for weeks now) I don't know what or how to make of it. From the standpoint of the purple down traverse, an up traverse MUST form. But no such up traverse ever did form. Does thise mean that the gray traverse is THE traverse, and no matter how wide it becomes is STILL a traverse? IOW, no matter how wide it gets, it's still the same fractal? Sincere apologies for lenght. I didnt' know how else to sort this out. Thank you all for your patience with me.
Bar 10 - vide supra. Bar 15 is a 'yen' bar and you are correct, the volume should have been black xhatched. Bar 36 is another clerical oversight. For those of you who may not be aware of it, avi8 is the CP (Charting Police) oberlieutenant and I look forward to his precision inspections of any charting material which I post. Danke, lj