I don't know how to intepret your eloquent response... I just wanted to prop up a mood of the thread a little bit. Anyway, I'm not offended. The journey goes on...
Hey gucci, no implications intended and besides which I really couldn't care what someone's preference is. Doesn't seem to bother dolphins as John C. Lilly (the dude said he could talk with them) discovered a long time ago. Anyhows what I see now is us in another 2 to 3 LM with a price width of 3.5 points. I know Jack and Spyder could trade this puppy but I'm just a simple traverse trader (learning to be one that is), so I jest be waitin'. lj
Spydertrader, would you call this market non-operating the last hour? Edit: ljyoung, I'm lost in this market as well.
I resent that implication gucci (just kidding) but it would be interesting to hear what Spyder has to say. All will become clear IF he gives us another EOD present. lj
Heres is a similar situation How do we know IN REAL TIME that it is not the neon green traverse as we have a dominant tape a retrace(pennant) followed by another dominant tape(both dominant tapes in royal blue) and that the Guassians are the thinner set of Guassians at the bottom as opposed to it being the neon blue traverse which corresponds to the thicker Guassians above the thinner ones. I'm trying to stick with the bar by bar tapes way(dom, non-dom, dom) and I annotated the neon green traverse before the neon blue one could even exist.
Thanks for the advice. I am finding that getting one's hands dirty actually helps seeing the signals with better clarity, even if after the fact. Even though your response was meant for the other person in may be a different context, but I am finding 'dirty hands' approach quite illuminating.