Oh geez, I hope so! So the earlier explanation of a 'simple' Jokari window 'change' is not considered? Instead, one goes down various 'holes' for a verbose answer? Look, bar 8 on 7/15 was Jokari window change. Period. Had nothing to do with CO anything. Perhaps each day is a bit more isolated than initially appears.
A VE can provide a signal for change, just as it can provide a signal for continuation. A very stark and clear cut, difference exists between the two situations. This unmistakable and unambiguous difference, once located, often causes the trader to wonder aloud, "Why the hell didn't I see this sooner!" What is this difference; decreasing Volume. A VE that has Decreasing Volume is a strong signal for change. -adapted from Spyder
Jokari window is simple indeed, context however is anything but. Bar 4 today (0950 eob increasing red volume with price going down) would have signaled 'simple' Jokari window 'continuation' if one thought that the price was moving in the dominant direction. However this was not the case as evident from Spydertrader's annotations. Decreasing red gaussian from the top of the bar 1 to the bottom of the bar 4. It wasn't even an FTT of the CO down channel which would explain increasing red. Instead the market spoken clear to him: non-dominant direction. I hope one day I am going to be able to see these things.
Allow me to translate: I still don't get Spydertrader's answer about the Jokari window. I am grasping here. I know this is Spydertrader's journal, but I like to ignore his advice about using only the ES and add 'JH' stuff. I like to type.
Chart for SOLF. Note the current dashed green channel constructed from the green and blue traverses. We have increasing black volume as price starts a new up traverse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mVWWmIXKxk&feature=related et http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7qop0CGHAo&feature=related The more things change, the more they remain the same. C'est tout. Which is to say, it's the mode, Claude. Y'all come down and see us. lj
Upon further review I realized I made a mistake in saying the green and blue traverses constructed a new up channel. What we have instead is the dashed pink down channel (constructed from the brown, green and blue traverses) inside of the purple down channel. We will therefore need an up channel (made of 3 traverses) to break out of the purple down channel.
Is it correct to view that as a point 3 non dom. traverse ( retrace) back to the right trendline of the down purple channel?
Back to german, I see. The 'video' links posted, are they one's attempts at 'M'? Or perhaps they are about gardening?