Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. Tums

    Tums

    I had this suspicion from the beginning -- because he knows this stuff inside out; he's not asking a question, he just wants a debate.
     
    #4261     May 31, 2008
  2. I doubt it.

    When addressing someone, or when referring to another individual or group, Asstral articulates his position while intentionally using pejorative vocabulary in an attempt to fein superiority at every opportunity. First noticed when he described those following this Journal as 'incompetents' and continuing on to his latest 'sheeple' commentary, we see, in Asstrals posts, an attempt to cover his own shortcomings by denegrating others.

    Clearly a much different psychosis than the one exhibited by BnB Analytics.

    Throughout life, each of us has an opportunity to learn valuable insights from individuals we encounter along the journey travelled. Some individuals provide opportunities for self improvement, while others, simply stand out as a warning.

    As a result, we can all put our time to far better use.

    Instead of responding to Asstrals delusions, moving forward, I plan to limit my comments to individuals who feel purposeful learning and critical thinking hold a higher priority than a semantic debate.

    Enjoy the weekend everyone.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #4262     May 31, 2008
  3. Tums

    Tums

    #4263     May 31, 2008
  4. yes of coarse....:D
     
    #4264     Jun 1, 2008
  5. cnms2

    cnms2

    I believe that the questions are:
    - Friday bar means change or continuation?
    - at the end of Friday bar are you long or short?
    - WMCN?
    - WMnCN?
     
    #4265     Jun 1, 2008
  6. [/QUOTE]
    WMCN if Flaw= BO up + Volume up (Continuation)
    WMCN if point 3 Down= Bo down + Volume up (Change)
    WMCN if Lateral= Volume Down (Change)
     
    #4266     Jun 1, 2008
  7. this is weekly time frame
     
    #4267     Jun 1, 2008
  8. Weekly/ Daily...:D
     
    #4268     Jun 1, 2008
  9. Hello all,
    Just a quick question about shorting equities. I recently had some success with my first short, but it got me thinking about the culling process. From what I understand, the process of culling out tocks serves several purposes. Two of the most important are:
    1) Finding strong stocks for Long positions
    2) Finding stocks that provide sufficient "velocity" in their upward spikes.

    To put it simply, doesn't the culling process eliminate the "best" candidates for shorting? Wouldn't another list need to be made of weak stocks which have shown a tendancy to have quick, downward movements?

    Thanks!

    JF
     
    #4269     Jun 1, 2008
  10. tobbe

    tobbe

    First discussed here, then here and here... and I am sure it was discussed in several other posts as well.
     
    #4270     Jun 1, 2008