Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. astral

    astral

    This, to me summarizes the entire Journal, so why do people feel to argue with me that much?

    I'm just Trying to point out that Spyder is not a saint. Even though he probably doesn't agree with me on that one either. This journey for many is already Way over a year, for some multiples years. Just Trying to do a wake up call for some.
    I've said it so many times, there's probably a few who follow this method who actually think critically for themselves. I myself got suckered in by the "Oh no, I missed that channel, I'm not doing it correct."
    Were some beginner start posting his charts like MAK did last year, I do not need to tell what kind of responses this guy would receive. Responses as in "Advice". Give me a break!
    Just Trying to point some things out.
    Enough ranting, and babbling for me now.
     
    #4161     May 29, 2008
  2. Tums

    Tums

    Did I misunderstand you? you asked
    My opinion is...
    You are being manipulative... you deleted part of our private conversation to serve your purpose. I have highlighted red below for your reference.

     
    #4162     May 29, 2008
  3. ivob

    ivob

    Okay. So I am manipulative and you are not being selective in your quotes at all...

    This:
    I agree with (who doesn't?) but it has nothing to do with what we were discussing. I was commenting on:
    Apart from this you are assuming I leave things out to serve my purpose. Again you misunderstood me.

    The reason I left that part out is that I felt it was not correct to publish it as it was kind of personal. Nothing more and nothing less and that part has nothing to do with the discussion. You already wrote: when you are ready.

    So again I am asking you:
    - Please tell me what is wrong with I will only enter on pt3 in opposite direction if you are not an expert trader? (and none of us is) Why is that anti Hershey?

    Sheesh... This is really a non-discussion. Many people enter on point 3, even experts and even people who are ready.

    regards,
    Ivo
     
    #4163     May 29, 2008
  4. Tums

    Tums



    My point was... It is Anti-everything we have learned so far if you want to make a ruleset not to trade a Pt1-FTT on whatever condition other than recognizing Continuation and Change.

    The keyword is ruleset.

    Are you implying that because I suggested "non-expert" traders should stay on the Forest level, that by default I also implied that it is a shame for "expert" trader to trade Pt3?

    What is your point?
     
    #4164     May 29, 2008
  5. ivob

    ivob

    Usually point 1. Depending on the context.

    Ivo
     
    #4165     May 29, 2008
  6. If you do not appreciate the teacher or the subject or any combination of the two in any way, please feel free to drop the course and spare others the discourtesy of reading your tripe.

    -guava
     
    #4166     May 29, 2008
  7. FTT
     
    #4167     May 29, 2008
  8. point 3 up
     
    #4168     May 29, 2008
  9. R2R
     
    #4169     May 29, 2008
  10. astral

    astral

    You're on a roll lately, super!:cool:
     
    #4170     May 29, 2008