Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. ES Daily - January 15/2008
    Last bar forming is for the 16th.
    Adjusted volume bottom pane.

    [​IMG]
     
    #301     Jan 15, 2008
  2. I understand that their can be multiple ve's in a row and also flaws can and will materialize. My point , which I seem to be having a hard time articulating is what I feel to be the importance of the original LTL and how price and volume levels react at the original LTL. To me, the LTL helps in my continuation /change mindset and future price anticipation. I was wondering if others had used or noticed this.

    In my chart, I am not looking for point 3 immediately following a ve.

    Hopefully the re-annotating clarifies my opinion
     
    #302     Jan 15, 2008
  3. Lookin for a breakout in STAR tomorrow of the current red channel. Looks like the FTT lines up to me with the fast stochastic and the decreasing black volume is in place. hopefully we see increasing black volume for the next few days confirming a BO.

    Comments and comparisons welcome.
     
    • star.gif
      File size:
      41.4 KB
      Views:
      197
    #303     Jan 15, 2008
  4. Hopefully this chart will help clarify what i'm trying to say.
     
    #304     Jan 15, 2008
  5. ivob

    ivob

    However you call it, aren't we just looking for a breakout of the triangle on increasing volume?

    regards,
    Ivo
     
    #305     Jan 15, 2008
  6. Padawan

    Padawan

    01-15-08
     
    #306     Jan 16, 2008
  7. bi9foot

    bi9foot

    Well if it breaks out with increasing volume everything is fine however in some cases that is not the case.

    - Sometimes price breaks out of the formation on low volume and the increasing volume comes once price has moved away from the formation.
    - Spyder has also mentioned how lateral formations and lateral movements are distinct things. Differentiating them provides important clues and hence I would consider it significant.

    http://tinyurl.com/3xrck5
     
    #307     Jan 16, 2008
  8. Thanks for the lucid drawings bi9. So would you say that c, d and e are all pennant BO's? Then with bar 4, there must be a close above the high of the first bar for a lateral formation BO (a,b,d,e) and for c it would be called a lateral movement BO (or something like that)? (Edit: Let's assume that in all cases the volumes are higher than bar 3).

    lj
     
    #308     Jan 16, 2008
  9. bi9foot

    bi9foot

    c & e are pennant BOs. d is not a BO since it did not clear the high of the prior bar.

    I would agree with your statement except to note that I would add "b" to the lateral movement category instead of lateral formation.
     
    #309     Jan 16, 2008
  10. Partial quote from bi9:
    c & e are pennant BOs. d is not a BO since it did not clear the high of the prior bar.

    That makes sense to me. Now let me ask one more question. Can you anticipate which of the five 3-bar entities would be more likely to go on to give a full-fledged BO and close above the high of bar 1? My guess is that it would be either c or e and with "comparable volumes for the 3-bars" would pick c because it has the pennant BO and a "tie" with b for the greatest pace - but I don't know.

    lj
     
    #310     Jan 16, 2008