I was sure hoping someone would have tried to help the new guy. Especially since it was me. I was on my old pc this morning and it must have erased cookies or something. It had been so long since I had to log onto ET I couldn't do it. It was easier to create a name. Ehorn told me I needed to change anyhow. He suggested maybe the screeen name had something to do with my inability to hold for traverses beyond 30 seconds. Thought I'd make him proud. Anyway just wanted to make that clear. In regards to the snip: In addition to the dbv's the lower gaus peaks would be reason to question the sequence repeat signal. I was looking forward to some other explanations though. wishing all a good week.
actually I didn't understand the question, there were 31 viewers I am sure somebody view it more than one (me) try to figure out what was the question.
sorry, The 1010 bar on 3-9 appeared to me as a signal we would go around again. I was wondering if someone could offer some insight on how to not come to that conclusion at the end of that bar. The 2 following dbv bars and the decreasing gaussians may have offered signs to question that mada, however a pace jump like that on the 10:10 bar are commonly associated with the sequence repeating. hope that was clearer. not sure why i included the 2 min es in the picture.
bar 10:10 of 3/9 belongs to an up traverse (p1-p2) starting since 3/6, at that bar we were still waiting for r2r of a down traverse (p2-p3). ps. don't know when will a seq repeats or not I just wait for the next r2r, b2b as a certain person said 'set in stone, everything starts with r2r, b2b'.
I guess, I have a penchant for stupid questions. Don't you think, that washes are unavoidable? You should excuse my diatribe here, but I think, that the acceptance of the indispensability of wash trades paves the way for understanding the difference between "what must come next" and "what comes next"? Could this difference be somehow related to "know" that you know and "know that you know"?